linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [5.4 PATCH] mm/gup: Do not force a COW break on file-backed memory
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:54:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiHpPXjA=i6e=3Pk13frRd-RVXfSrT6=KfU2tg4Pu5MmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YahHZOnT1Uh41XnP@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:11 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> The other patch we've been kicking around (and works) is:
>
>  static inline bool should_force_cow_break(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned
> int flags)
>  {
> -       return is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) && (flags & FOLL_GET);
> +       return is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) &&
> +               (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_DENYWRITE)) && (flags & FOLL_GET);
>  }

That patch makes no sense to me.

It may "work", but it doesn't actually do anything sensible or really
fix the problem that I can tell.

I suspect a real fix would be bigger and more invasive.

If the answer is not to backport all the other changes (and they were
_really_ invasive), I think one answer may be to simply move the
"should_force_cow_break()" down to below the point where you've looked
up the page.

Then you can actually look at "is this a file mapped page", and say
"if so, that's ok, we can return it as-is".

Otherwise, you do something like

        foll_flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
        free_page(page);
        goto repeat;

to repeat the loop (now with FOLL_WRITE).

So the patch is bigger and more involved, because you would have done
the page lookup (for reading) and now notice "Oh, I need it for
writing instead" so you need to undo and re-do).

But at least - unlike backporting everything else - it would be
limited to that one __get_user_pages() function.

Hmm?

(And you'd need to handle that follow_hugetlb_page() case too), not
just the follow_page_mask() one)

             Linus


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-01 23:17 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-12-02  3:51 ` Jann Horn
2021-12-02  4:11   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-02  4:33     ` Jann Horn
2021-12-02 18:54     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-12-02 19:59       ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-02 22:33         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiHpPXjA=i6e=3Pk13frRd-RVXfSrT6=KfU2tg4Pu5MmQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox