From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
liam.howlett@oracle.com, david@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
ldufour@linux.ibm.com, vbabka@suse.cz, michel@lespinasse.org,
jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, hughd@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: always lock new vma before inserting into vma tree
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:01:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiCrWAoEesBuoGoqqufvesicbGp3cX0LyKgEvsFaZNpDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803172652.2849981-6-surenb@google.com>
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 10:27, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> While it's not strictly necessary to lock a newly created vma before
> adding it into the vma tree (as long as no further changes are performed
> to it), it seems like a good policy to lock it and prevent accidental
> changes after it becomes visible to the page faults. Lock the vma before
> adding it into the vma tree.
So my main reaction here is that I started to wonder about the vma allocation.
Why doesn't vma_init() do something like
mmap_assert_write_locked(mm);
vma->vm_lock_seq = mm->mm_lock_seq;
and instead we seem to expect vma_lock_alloc() to do this (and do it
very badly indeed).
Strange.
Anyway, this observation was just a reaction to that "not strictly
necessary to lock a newly created vma" part of the commentary. I feel
like we could/should just make sure that all newly created vma's are
always simply created write-locked.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-03 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-03 17:26 [PATCH v3 0/6] make vma locking more obvious Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: enable page walking API to lock vmas during the walk Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: for !CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK equate write lock assertion for vma and mmap Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: replace mmap with vma write lock assertions when operating on a vma Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: lock vma explicitly before doing vm_flags_reset and vm_flags_reset_once Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: always lock new vma before inserting into vma tree Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2023-08-03 18:15 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-08-03 18:26 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 18:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: move vma locking out of vma_prepare and dup_anon_vma Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 18:32 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-08-03 19:14 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-03 19:20 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-08-04 15:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] make vma locking more obvious Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiCrWAoEesBuoGoqqufvesicbGp3cX0LyKgEvsFaZNpDA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox