linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Buffered I/O broken on s390x with page faults disabled (gfs2)
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:54:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh+U6SkJtNeWCJBaKv31dQALfXn_jCSo9=o5p-_==bBrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whycC7kUa=_CiDr9pPpPp8g+9u7kKe1ssSsgGGkhBTvVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:48 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Basically FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE implies a kind of "half-way ALLOW_RETRY"
> - allow aborting, but only for the fatal signal case.

Side note: I'm not saying this is a *good* thing - it is very
confusing - but it's due to historical reasons where architectures
ended up getting these features incrementally.

So FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE was one such half-way step, where you could
abort things without actually retrying them, because a fatal signal
could be handled without then repeating things.

These days, I think all architectures have converted their actual
fault handling to the full "retry/abort/error/success" spectrum, but
then you still have other uses of handle_mm_fault() that may not be
willing to have mmap_sem be dropped in the middle of operations
because they keep a 'vma' list around or something like that.

And then FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE can still be a good way to say "ok, I'm
willing to _abort_ things entirely, but you can't drop the mmap sem
and ask me to recover if it's not fatal".

And this is all entirely due to historical behavior, since
_originally_ handle_mm_fault() wouldn't ever drop mmap_sem at all.
These days it would probably be simpler to *not* have all these
complicated special cases, and just say that FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is
always true.

But then somebody would have to walk through every user to make sure it's ok...

           Linus


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 22:52 Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-07 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08  8:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08  8:37     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 12:11       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 12:24         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 13:20           ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-08 13:32             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14               ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-08 17:23           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 17:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 17:40       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 19:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 20:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 23:24             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09  0:22               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 18:42                 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 19:08                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:57                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 21:08                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 12:13                       ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-09 19:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 19:35                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 20:18                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:36                         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 20:48                           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:54                             ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2022-03-10 17:13           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-10 18:00             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 18:35             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 18:38               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-10 18:47               ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 19:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 19:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 20:23                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-08 17:47       ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wh+U6SkJtNeWCJBaKv31dQALfXn_jCSo9=o5p-_==bBrA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox