From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Olivier Dion <odion@efficios.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] SKSM: Synchronous Kernel Samepage Merging
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:51:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgedRzDqOLhbOnvziVHZm9jtGOrT4GJEqA9etJDwTQ5Mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250228023043.83726-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 18:31, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> This series introduces SKSM, a new page deduplication ABI,
> aiming to fix the limitations inherent to the KSM ABI.
So I'm not interested in seeing *another* KSM version.
Because I absolutely do *NOT* want a new chapter in the saga of SLUB
vs SLAB vs SLOB.
However, if the feeling is that this can *replace* the current horror
that is KSM, I'm a lot more interested. I suspect our current KSM
model has largely been a failure, and this might be "good enough".
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 2:30 Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: Introduce " Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftests/kskm: Introduce SKSM basic test Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2025-02-28 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] SKSM: Synchronous Kernel Samepage Merging Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 5:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-28 13:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-28 15:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 21:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 21:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 21:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 15:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 14:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 16:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-02-28 17:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-28 22:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-01 15:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-03-03 15:01 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-03 16:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-03 20:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-03-03 20:45 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-03 20:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-05 14:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-03-05 19:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 15:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 15:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgedRzDqOLhbOnvziVHZm9jtGOrT4GJEqA9etJDwTQ5Mg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=odion@efficios.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox