linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm: improve pte updates and dirty/accessed
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:00:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgEa8MrxrDUFs8H1E_fL6GngWbh+vcgtnsHD4nvRp4d_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201220045535.848591-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 8:55 PM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Time to get this old series out again. Since last time, Bibo found a
> couple of the same cases I did (for MIPS only) which I extend to all
> archs, and I dropped the "make the pte dirty if the fork parent was
> dirty" due to Linus pointing out a dirty PTE costs more to unmap. It
> didn't seem to help a great deal anyway on the access-side fortunately.

Looks ok to me. I'm surprised it's all that noticeable, but I don't
see anything worrisome in the patches.

            Linus


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-20 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-20  4:55 Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-20  4:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/cow: don't bother write protecting already write-protected huge pages Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-20  4:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/cow: optimise pte accessed bit handling in fork Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-20  4:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: optimise pte dirty/accessed bit setting by demand based pte insertion Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-21 18:21   ` Hugh Dickins
2020-12-22  3:24     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-23  0:56       ` Huang Pei
2020-12-20 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgEa8MrxrDUFs8H1E_fL6GngWbh+vcgtnsHD4nvRp4d_w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox