From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] writeback: Fix false warning in inode_to_wb()
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:48:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU6NHxG-Tn+5tn2zy3QJFVruOM6tG7DsDi1sF+vDw4Xr_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_eGvBHssVtGKpty@infradead.org>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:52 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:21:02PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > -static inline struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb(const struct inode *inode)
> > +static inline struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks &&
> > + inode_cgwb_enabled(inode) &&
> > (!lockdep_is_held(&inode->i_lock) &&
> > !lockdep_is_held(&inode->i_mapping->i_pages.xa_lock) &&
> > !lockdep_is_held(&inode->i_wb->list_lock)));
> > --
>
> This means that even on cgroup aware file systems we now only get
> the locking validation if cgroups are actually enabled for the file
> system instance and thus hugely reducing coverage, which is rather
> unfortunate.
Right. Is checking for (inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_CGROUPWB) instead okay?
Thanks,
Andreas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 18:21 [RFC 0/2] Fix false warning in inode_to_wb Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-04-07 18:21 ` [RFC 1/2] gfs2: replace sd_aspace with sd_inode Andreas Gruenbacher
[not found] ` <77b1b228-3799-43e3-ab30-5aec1d633816@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
2025-04-08 11:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-04-10 8:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 19:20 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-04-07 18:21 ` [RFC 2/2] writeback: Fix false warning in inode_to_wb() Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-04-10 8:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 17:48 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHc6FU6NHxG-Tn+5tn2zy3QJFVruOM6tG7DsDi1sF+vDw4Xr_g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox