Oliver Sang 于2024年6月5日 周三19:16写道: > hi, Yang Shi, > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 04:53:56PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yang Shi wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:02 AM Oliver Sang > wrote: > > > > > > > > hi, Yang Shi, > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:57:06PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > > > > > Hi Oliver, > > > > > > > > > > I just came up with a quick patch (just build test) per the > discussion > > > > > and attached, can you please to give it a try? Once it is > verified, I > > > > > will refine the patch and submit for review. > > > > > > > > what's the base of this patch? I tried to apply it upon efa7df3e3b or > > > > v6.10-rc2. both failed. > > > > > > Its base is mm-unstable. The head commit is 8e06d6b9274d ("mm: add > > > swappiness= arg to memory.reclaim"). Sorry for the confusion, I should > > > have mentioned this. > > > > I just figured out a bug in the patch. Anyway, we are going to take a > > different approach to fix the issue per the discussion. I already sent > > the series to the mailing list. Please refer to > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240604234858.948986-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.com/ > > got it. seems you will submit v2? should we wait v2 to do the tests? The real fix is patch #1, that doesn’t need v2. So you just need to test that. For patch #2, I haven’t received any comment yet and I’m going to travel so I’m not going to submit v2 soon . And I heard if hugepd is going to be gone soon, so I may wait for that then rebase on top of it. Anyway it is just a clean up. > > sorry that due to resource constraint, we cannot respond test request very > quickly now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Yang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David / dhildenb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >