From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] mm/thp: refix __split_huge_pmd_locked() for migration PMD
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:51:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkppwEBSkd2QFAHkRfQPsLqzRqPegbNUg_bnY62ai2Emyg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84792468-f512-e48f-378c-e34c3641e97@google.com>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:43 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
>
> Migration entries do not contribute to a page's reference count: move
> __split_huge_pmd_locked()'s page_ref_add() into pmd_migration's else
> block (along with the page_count() check - a page is quite likely to
> to have reference count frozen to 0 when a migration entry is found).
>
> This will fix a very rare anonymous memory leak, after a split_huge_pmd()
> raced with an anon split_huge_page() or an anon THP migrate_pages(): since
> the wrongly raised refcount stopped the page (perhaps small, perhaps huge,
> depending on when the race hit) from ever being freed. At first I thought
> there were worse risks, from prematurely unfreezing a frozen page: but now
> think that would only affect page cache pages, which do not come this way
> (except for anonymous pages in swap cache, perhaps).
Thanks for catching this. I agree there may be anon memory leak due to
bumped refcount. But I don't think it could affect page cache page
since that code (bumping refcount) is never called for page cache page
IIUC.
The patch looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
>
> Fixes: ec0abae6dcdf ("mm/thp: fix __split_huge_pmd_locked() for migration PMD")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
> That's an unfair "Fixes": it did not introduce the problem, but it
> missed this aspect of the problem; and will be a good guide to where this
> refix should go if stable backports are asked for.
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2039,9 +2039,9 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> young = pmd_young(old_pmd);
> soft_dirty = pmd_soft_dirty(old_pmd);
> uffd_wp = pmd_uffd_wp(old_pmd);
> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page), page);
> + page_ref_add(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1);
> }
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page), page);
> - page_ref_add(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1);
>
> /*
> * Withdraw the table only after we mark the pmd entry invalid.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 1:43 Hugh Dickins
2022-03-03 19:51 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2022-03-03 22:45 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHbLzkppwEBSkd2QFAHkRfQPsLqzRqPegbNUg_bnY62ai2Emyg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox