linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Bergen <ebergen@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: split khugepaged stats from direct reclaim stats
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:53:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpaoN37camSLYVDU7p9AXzQjYcvHnWm3K87iwae-YyZiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1hM6sMRpBGUPRyo@cmpxchg.org>

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:54 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:40:15PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Direct reclaim stats are useful for identifying a potential source for
> > > application latency, as well as spotting issues with kswapd. However,
> > > khugepaged currently distorts the picture: as a kernel thread it
> > > doesn't impose allocation latencies on userspace, and it explicitly
> > > opts out of kswapd reclaim. Its activity showing up in the direct
> > > reclaim stats is misleading. Counting it as kswapd reclaim could also
> > > cause confusion when trying to understand actual kswapd behavior.
> > >
> > > Break out khugepaged from the direct reclaim counters into new
> > > pgsteal_khugepaged, pgdemote_khugepaged, pgscan_khugepaged counters.
> > >
> > > Test with a huge executable (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS):
> > >
> > > pgsteal_kswapd 1342185
> > > pgsteal_direct 0
> > > pgsteal_khugepaged 3623
> > > pgscan_kswapd 1345025
> > > pgscan_direct 0
> > > pgscan_khugepaged 3623
> >
> > There are other kernel threads or works may allocate memory then
> > trigger memory reclaim, there may be similar problems for them and
> > someone may try to add a new stat. So how's about we make the stats
> > more general, for example, call it "pg{steal|scan}_kthread"?
>
> I'm not convinved that's a good idea.
>
> Can you generally say that userspace isn't indirectly waiting for one
> of those allocating threads? With khugepaged, we know.

AFAIK, ksm may do slab allocation with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. Some
device mapper drivers may do heavy lift in the work queue, for
example, dm-crypt, particularly for writing.

>
> And those other allocations are usually ___GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM, so if
> they do direct reclaim, we'd probably want to know that kswapd is
> failing to keep up (doubly so if userspace is waiting). In a shared
> kthread counter, khugepaged would again muddy the waters.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25 17:05 Johannes Weiner
2022-10-25 17:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-25 20:43   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-25 19:40 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-25 20:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-25 21:53     ` Yang Shi [this message]
2022-10-26 17:32       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-26 20:51         ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27  2:41           ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-27 14:15             ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-27 20:43               ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-28 14:39                 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-28 17:41                   ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-31 16:00                     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-31 16:46                       ` Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHbLzkpaoN37camSLYVDU7p9AXzQjYcvHnWm3K87iwae-YyZiQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebergen@meta.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox