From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"Naoya Horiguchi" <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: set PageHWPoison after taking page lock in memory_failure_hugetlb()
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:50:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpXOYKQtN6xjSKShD8_h_dLy3GA6MZB9rLMvsXC3seERg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a61c5c1-a99b-9da9-b319-90f95a420ab1@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:24 PM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022/3/10 8:30, Yang Shi wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:01 PM HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
> > <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:55:30PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:15 AM Naoya Horiguchi
> >>> <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> There is a race condition between memory_failure_hugetlb() and hugetlb
> >>>> free/demotion, which causes setting PageHWPoison flag on the wrong page
> >>>> (which was a hugetlb when memory_failrue() was called, but was removed
> >>>> or demoted when memory_failure_hugetlb() is called). This results in
> >>>> killing wrong processes. So set PageHWPoison flag with holding page lock,
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> mm/memory-failure.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> >>>> index ac6492e36978..fe25eee8f9d6 100644
> >>>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> >>>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> >>>> @@ -1494,24 +1494,11 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> >>>> int res;
> >>>> unsigned long page_flags;
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head)) {
> >>>> - pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: already hardware poisoned\n",
> >>>> - pfn);
> >>>> - res = -EHWPOISON;
> >>>> - if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
> >>>> - res = kill_accessing_process(current, page_to_pfn(head), flags);
> >>>> - return res;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> -
> >>>> - num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> >>>> -
> >>>> if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)) {
> >>>> res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags);
> >>>
> >>> I'm not an expert of hugetlb, I may be wrong. I'm wondering how this
> >>> could solve the race? Is the below race still possible?
> >>>
> >>> __get_hwpoison_page()
> >>> head = compound_head(page)
> >>>
> >>> hugetlb demotion (1G --> 2M)
> >>> get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
> >>
> >> Thanks for the comment.
> >> I assume Miaohe's patch below introduces additional check to detect the
> >> race. The patch calls compound_head() for the raw error page again, so
> >> the demotion case should be detected. I'll make the dependency clear in
> >> the commit log.
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220228140245.24552-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com/
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Then the head may point to a 2M page, but the hwpoisoned subpage is
> >>> not in that 2M range?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> if (!res) {
> >>>> lock_page(head);
> >>>> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> >>>> - if (TestClearPageHWPoison(head))
> >>>> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> >>>> unlock_page(head);
> >>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -1544,13 +1531,16 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> >>>> page_flags = head->flags;
> >>>>
> >>>> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> >>>> - if (TestClearPageHWPoison(head))
> >>>> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> >>>> put_page(p);
> >>>> res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>> goto out;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head))
> >>>
> >>> And I don't think "head" is still the head you expected if the race
> >>> happened. I think we need to re-retrieve the head once the page
> >>> refcount is bumped and locked.
> >>
> >> I think the above justification works for this.
> >> When the kernel reaches this line, the hugepage is properly pinned without being
> >> freed or demoted, so "head" is still pointing to the same head page as expected.
> >
> > I think Mike's comment in the earlier email works for this too. The
> > huge page may get demoted before the page is pinned and locked, so the
> > actual hwpoisoned subpage may belong to another smaller huge page now.
> >
>
> I thinks Naoya assumes that there is a check before we use "head":
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 5444a8ef4867..0d7c58340a98 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1534,6 +1534,17 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> }
>
> lock_page(head);
> +
> + /**
> + * The page could have changed compound pages due to race window.
> + * If this happens just bail out.
> + */
> + if (!PageHuge(p) || compound_head(p) != head) {
> + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_COMPOUND, MF_IGNORED);
> + res = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> page_flags = head->flags;
>
> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> --
> from: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220228140245.24552-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com/
Aha, thanks, I missed that. Yeah, we definitely need to revalidate the page.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Naoya Horiguchi
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> + goto already_hwpoisoned;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> >>>> +
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * TODO: hwpoison for pud-sized hugetlb doesn't work right now, so
> >>>> * simply disable it. In order to make it work properly, we need
> >>>> @@ -1576,6 +1566,13 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> >>>> out:
> >>>> unlock_page(head);
> >>>> return res;
> >>>> +already_hwpoisoned:
> >>>> + unlock_page(head);
> >>>> + pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: already hardware poisoned\n", pfn);
> >>>> + res = -EHWPOISON;
> >>>> + if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
> >>>> + res = kill_accessing_process(current, page_to_pfn(head), flags);
> >>>> + return res;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.25.1
> >>>>
> > .
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-09 9:14 Naoya Horiguchi
2022-03-09 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2022-03-10 1:15 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-09 21:55 ` Yang Shi
2022-03-09 23:59 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-03-10 0:29 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-10 0:00 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-10 0:30 ` Yang Shi
2022-03-10 6:23 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-10 17:50 ` Yang Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHbLzkpXOYKQtN6xjSKShD8_h_dLy3GA6MZB9rLMvsXC3seERg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox