From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBBFC433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69268207B1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:06:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69268207B1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B51858D0049; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id ADBB18D0023; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:06:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 953198D0049; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:06:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0241.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.241]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7328B8D0023 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:06:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305808249980 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77745531486.29.shop28_5403e6827588 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EB118085CE0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: shop28_5403e6827588 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6806 Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ke15so20014566ejc.12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:06:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FX9j6fg/l3UnkjnVovfbEoZ/VqeYVGd4XAUneqdYGy4=; b=DMtqO9rfFBKbqSFMAzoPBZgstYNBfe9bsglQhNCo3FXF1ZAm9pbpoCu/H0E9kWke5f bu8Z5w+LmC92NS2470l4llha0LtbIdevkh2Jex5wA7Ac6n2Gah9pHRPPzbvfndnzMdBh U3LTDwLrQdi8VFiu+w7bhJ5fw4wNRcYJ7gk9pkK3SNSkC2Jn9WOTdTgtnT68BY/xntlE 68H2Npz6SP5jvETKHGiU3p8JKGk/lydaQ61RG59vtw5zlf+yjAWxxp/VR3rCJKSNfHyP 0RHjXe4b2KAZ02nA6G0YGs+o2Z3oWOKDOTyFNAgfxOG4EXoDjPfLpgDXIXZlu7tR0mJd 6DEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FX9j6fg/l3UnkjnVovfbEoZ/VqeYVGd4XAUneqdYGy4=; b=e2ttFjLFwYR64yzlyiKp2vDb20cgSQnSuWgGREqwcO4yMziE7mXou40pu6n0LlFR/D gdRPUmfRgSruN1tDfWXFrzAgiHtiZ46b0It/ckylUW3KQhBWpWWNXDYUobHRxkbB/01p 4pvlB+9yuP0clqcW/EE/qMc416XBJdIWyrxg3Pu0q3cK/QG0151k//NwzD4PtBd8fhIR 5yub3GiiocNZYxVNRhFfQbNhT5IKlk0zifGTHNLhj5qUoyi5vUkIzODbLRpqcBJExTsN rLh0lB9XPubiVuMvTL5ecwULGhAvdYEUDwQxvI+/HALx0QPsrasP4YZjTDyAb7sPClVn XZtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kHE/SZuNvvBRdz0kKv9obYFyXtg7MzuWaiyh2tgnFx+6QpEEQ f3KvQEDbCxOB2g9BisB265bYoL7gJhurkwwJjlE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiwfxNZpAkTfcMRZ2FWtH2Y+PYzlxEANL1/0TqlA6dV9oKAa/+FOiAhCvB+cYclrXR1HGe4HhBvK9t/iHKcdQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:94d3:: with SMTP id d19mr1422050ejy.383.1611608801446; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:06:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210121230621.654304-1-shy828301@gmail.com> <20210121230621.654304-5-shy828301@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Yang Shi Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:06:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size To: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Dave Chinner , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linux MM , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:36 AM Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > On 22.01.2021 02:06, Yang Shi wrote: > > Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the > > map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep both. > > Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating the > > bit map. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > > --- > > mm/vmscan.c | 16 +++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > > index d3f3701dfcd2..40e7751ef961 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list); > > static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG > > - > > -static int memcg_shrinker_map_size; > > +static int shrinker_nr_max; > > > > static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) > > { > > @@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > return 0; > > > > down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > > - size = memcg_shrinker_map_size; > > + size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); > > for_each_node(nid) { > > map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid); > > if (!map) { > > @@ -266,10 +265,11 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) > > { > > int size, old_size, ret = 0; > > + int new_nr_max = new_id + 1; > > struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > > > > - size = DIV_ROUND_UP(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long); > > - old_size = memcg_shrinker_map_size; > > + size = (new_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); > > + old_size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); > > > > if (size <= old_size) > > return 0; > > This looks a BUG: > > expand_shrinker_maps(id == 1) > { > old_size = 64; > size = 64; > > ===>return 0 and shrinker_nr_max remains 0. > } > > Then shrink_slab_memcg() misses this shrinker since shrinker_nr_max == 0. Yes, thanks for catching this. It should be fixed by the below patch: diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index bb254d39339f..47010a69b400 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id) old_d_size = shrinker_nr_max * sizeof(atomic_long_t); old_size = old_m_size + old_d_size; if (size <= old_size) - return 0; + goto out; if (!root_mem_cgroup) goto out; > > > > > @@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) > > goto out; > > } > > } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL); > > + > > out: > > if (!ret) > > - memcg_shrinker_map_size = size; > > + shrinker_nr_max = new_nr_max; > > > > return ret; > > } > > @@ -321,7 +322,6 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id) > > #define SHRINKER_REGISTERING ((struct shrinker *)~0UL) > > > > static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr); > > -static int shrinker_nr_max; > > > > static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > > { > > @@ -338,8 +338,6 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > > idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id); > > goto unlock; > > } > > - > > - shrinker_nr_max = id + 1; > > } > > shrinker->id = id; > > ret = 0; > > > >