From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCE8C5ACC4 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D535206E2 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="VK+0jpev" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D535206E2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E231C6B0005; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:05:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DD31D6B0006; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:05:52 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CC2046B0007; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:05:52 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0202.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.202]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B005B6B0005 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:05:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A52B181AEF09 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:05:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76508562144.29.fan77_161f763aad40f X-HE-Tag: fan77_161f763aad40f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3902 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com (mail-oi1-f194.google.com [209.85.167.194]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a142so25722948oii.7 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=On4/X6XTdlAfrZHKoVhgecOTEOux4GHMdiEnySmBdt8=; b=VK+0jpevVkZp/UHyagl40Y2dezLtobNOAkPWNA2EFwgtAnqWXAvRKL2fUDYjIIYuOX 5sD5qSv5bL+cr76lEQf4F46fwYdhqauQO/x/HQNTZ0vVr6HL9LZOVD6/suQ3H0O7Caep qwIOgwYDsQ9Dgev+b1WryYQ43HfiGsFPeyaTa2mBQ9iRyhI96dyn+5Msdo/n+suooF0w b+VcqixzW9m6IGvKS6k2wPw3kiwfoRYj6ynaXhaSWThUHIR+lDRULTcPDalnZsalZW69 X6syUyxegauMHYLgPzslGiMCLpScqFt1HGn7ExxFY9FrlOAiKd+ceTkoGJ2L7dqWkMOa 4jBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=On4/X6XTdlAfrZHKoVhgecOTEOux4GHMdiEnySmBdt8=; b=Bu4mZjGU/3CljqZ5+tiXri8+Z0ESMn1hr55WcYvOakYXy78AZClx+T1MvRS714Mqx6 efprhIJrzcXdSYRtahepqKc23tPmg2J4HHhbRpSk3+WLaNkMmxlumBUtnA2HSa3wzURx gjQ5ObX3bTbC+vdl3GDglszIg4axuZTvq7c/pFkdqiitvkuyAeM+RpXRvab957l3DP1T aeOoUoTOZkW6QkVZ8u7TjAfzOHnNO8TFWQAcxBw7A/eK/psW8jObdSgLOlDXnXSXHri8 W6BoeVvHHHPfHu2pb4TfNomGPSoS2r+FnDj0FZOttFqqXU/gX/r10hmNRIBH+mVgy1PZ ELvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVAmBNemuGieIVW5nUNx1K7fQaEzMd5O/W1IjGn/o+XAfsKfhof N+2k9zOVC1oPDOfGYKN4nCs2zUwpJr05BplxdNffkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7kVH16uapNvK9tOipvAvk7gTbvKB9LtiGZMaNftmOXBmHqRRY9147oKxDVcrMXpx3fHZc1RbJlcQ1qSDu6Mg= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d6c8:: with SMTP id n191mr183736oig.103.1582157151087; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20200211213128.73302-8-almasrymina@google.com> <37a49c35-567f-1663-33cd-3dac150020a0@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <37a49c35-567f-1663-33cd-3dac150020a0@linux.ibm.com> From: Mina Almasry Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 8/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests To: Sandipan Das Cc: Mike Kravetz , shuah , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Greg Thelen , Andrew Morton , open list , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:50 AM Sandipan Das wrote: > > > > On 12/02/20 3:01 am, Mina Almasry wrote: > > The tests use both shared and private mapped hugetlb memory, and > > monitors the hugetlb usage counter as well as the hugetlb reservation > > counter. They test different configurations such as hugetlb memory usage > > via hugetlbfs, or MAP_HUGETLB, or shmget/shmat, and with and without > > MAP_POPULATE. > > > > Also add test for hugetlb reservation reparenting, since this is > > a subtle issue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry > > Cc: sandipan@linux.ibm.com Hi folks, Sandipan provided a Tested-by but this is more or less the only patch in the series that is awaiting review. Can someone take a look? Shuah, you started reviewing this months ago and I addressed the comments. Maybe you can take another look? Thanks in advance!