From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93127C2D0D2 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A0222314 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="OvFqvh8Y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58A0222314 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CDDE78E0150; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C8E838E00F5; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BA4A08E0150; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0159.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.159]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AE88E00F5 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:59:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 532902C34 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76280234100.20.rose45_700943eabc55d X-HE-Tag: rose45_700943eabc55d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4461 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com [209.85.210.68]) by imf31.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id i15so5014482oto.7 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TQOUWeuTEyIUZEEQ2jTpgmNLbvpJOv+XxTa7wYSNX3g=; b=OvFqvh8YdAzV55/KDAESLZTnpZ9T/+xm2NNdL3mtyu1mL1Ber7NA3Ncg6I6b7iipv/ 87+tC1A2QDAE4hEaupil/r5OgnOAU0+LIexdh4XDQlJ5PBsHVM39PSrtZl+WeVzBuZny 6kGu+jbsvpGz8aZPi8Ne1veypupNUpV2ZlQG9SlklJQRVHIPyapP0sLjfUYrK1yPN9g8 XAWgXdrzAfdnGfaUrLVhKsvUO0epe+i4E2S+uTxfmEQWjHer1Cua9iTKw82qgNrlfn7X ito3480sINFyoXjWIBRX75+wF64wksHkV3bEmsaHR9fp9gjzkFdjPPjPQ3k35CqUyLDa ABrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TQOUWeuTEyIUZEEQ2jTpgmNLbvpJOv+XxTa7wYSNX3g=; b=H7EI3o7KyOfKpFjkIInDX+MzSnaczqsONoaXNlFNLDB3NbVjnHxfcfBjUr20xeYy4Q Hd/mOC2XYguulkH9H6FA3fSFyXfu9R1GV4fVBloNEM8KvVtrCHx/BgYZqApNbNJiNOlF UsuAUDPti1LJPWpeF3pFABKvO47v2TpZaXdjFQV2hH1xJq4UfHspSFwEbVTCBafryF+k 57vl8jTxk0ESa8WPBOVziT2w4Ayd+JruvdMrN8OlznsJUDKYWQ/AFkKqiVes7rIy4zcM ZwcU1g7JcExxEsnX8Wpz2tK+YO1xMcTqeaRVnth3fzfHvzlxpQGljB1T3rXjXpqIvEm2 L6bA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyTm0U6qWZur/9rIMBIoETXt8X4rqEI3Ja83xy/ut6ajf3B/oI SGWMHVj10yx/d/zEZBxX52g/IXdZyWIjZv5B7BIVUQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1ha9qc+r4oDyIBgGQt/Isc2y55K20/dwEtbJTlEEWs6r5FLMbK9py0Kzjg45819sYbwm3CtqEmDDBcaTRo3Q= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2028:: with SMTP id n37mr6290845ota.127.1576720768716; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191217231615.164161-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20191218171254.79664a964c0c61e6054dff64@linux-foundation.org> <4d11fb25-5036-6c78-5328-10a0c14e8edc@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4d11fb25-5036-6c78-5328-10a0c14e8edc@oracle.com> From: Mina Almasry Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Andrew Morton , shuah , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Greg Thelen , open list , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Aneesh Kumar , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Hillf Danton , Giuseppe Scrivano , Tejun Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:37 PM Mike Kravetz wrote: > > On 12/18/19 5:12 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:16:08 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > >> This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify > >> functionality and show the usage. We also added cgroup-v2 support to > >> hugetlb_cgroup so that the new use cases can be extended to v2. > > > > This would make > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191216193831.540953-1-gscrivan@redhat.com > > obsolete? > > I haven't started looking at this series yet. However, since Mina was > involved in the discussion of that patch (hugetlb controller for cgroups v2) > my assumption is that this patch would simply build on that v2 support? > Seems like the above patch would be a prereq for this series. > > Mina, are those assumptions correct and perhaps this is an old/obsolete > comment? Does this series apply 'on top' of the above patch? That patch > is already in Andrew's tree. Gah, I just forgot to update this commit message. This patch series is indeed on top of Giuseppe's v2 support and doesn't conflict or duplicate that functionality. Sorry for the confusion. I'll fix the commit message in the next iteration. > -- > Mike Kravetz