linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, rgbi3307@nate.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/core: modified control->repeat loop at the kdamond_call()
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:23:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHOvCC6RwVzujJcuosiignDEQoe038eRJHuJVLEtJ4-qP8Ot9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251231012826.75989-1-sj@kernel.org>

On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 10:28, SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:57:15 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:14:37 +0900 JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I will reflect the above in patch v2.
> > > Would you like me to resend patch v2 ?
> >
> > I just found my fix [1] of the bug that you reported has a race condition.  And
> > to fix that, I think kdamond_call() will anyway need to be modified.  I will
> > shortly send more details as a reply to the fix [1].  Can you please hold this
> > refactoring until all discussions about the bug fix is done?  Sorry for your
> > inconvenience.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20251228183105.289441-1-sj@kernel.org
>
> I ended up sending the new version of the fix [1] without changes on
> kdamond_call().  Unless you have concerns on the fix, please feel free to
> proceed to v2 of this patch.  Thank you for patiently waiting.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20251231012315.75835-1-sj@kernel.org

My patch for the kdamond_call() function further improves control->list
to behave as a FIFO.  This also improves stability against the control->list
collision issue encountered when damon_call() is called.
If there are no further objections, I'll send you Patch v2.

Thanks,
JaeJoon

>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-31  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24 12:43 JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-25  1:07 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-25  3:10   ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-25 20:00     ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-26  2:19       ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-26 18:31         ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-26 23:42           ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-30  0:14             ` JaeJoon Jung
2025-12-30  0:57               ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31  1:28                 ` SeongJae Park
2025-12-31  6:23                   ` JaeJoon Jung [this message]
2025-12-31 15:29                     ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-01  1:22                       ` JaeJoon Jung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHOvCC6RwVzujJcuosiignDEQoe038eRJHuJVLEtJ4-qP8Ot9w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rgbi3307@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rgbi3307@nate.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox