From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDE06B005A for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:11:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wo20so9914015obc.0 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-x22a.google.com (mail-oa0-x22a.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22a]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jb8si12278638obb.1.2014.02.04.09.11.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i7so10225110oag.1 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:11:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1391446195-9457-1-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:10:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: __set_page_dirty_nobuffers uses spin_lock_irqseve instead of spin_lock_irq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , Larry Woodman , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , stable@vger.kernel.org > Indeed, good catch. Do we need the same treatment for > __set_page_dirty_buffers() that can be called by way of > clear_page_dirty_for_io()? Indeed. I posted a patch fixed __set_page_dirty() too. plz see Subject: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock_irq -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org