From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f69.google.com (mail-lf0-f69.google.com [209.85.215.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849486B0007 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 04:57:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f69.google.com with SMTP id l72-v6so2731811lfl.20 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id o81-v6sor630734lja.59.2018.06.04.01.57.29 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:57:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1527940734-35161-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com> <1527940734-35161-2-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com> <20180604065238.GE19202@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?56a56Iif6ZSu?= Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:57:17 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, guro@fb.com, yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wind Yu Hi Michal > I have earlier suggested that you split this into two parts. One to add > the missing information and the later to convert it to a single printk > output. I'm sorry I do not get your point. What do you mean the missing information? > but it still really begs an example why we really insist on a single > printk and that should be in its own changelog. Actually , I just know that we should avoid the interleaving messages in the dmesg. But I don't know how to reproduce this issue. I think I can just recount this issue in the changelog. Thanks