Re: [PATCH v9] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header

[禹舟键 <ufo19890607@gmail.com>]

Hi Michal
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index 6adac113e96d..5bed78d4bfb8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,20 @@ struct notifier_block;
>  struct mem_cgroup;
>  struct task_struct;
>
> +enum oom_constraint {
> +     CONSTRAINT_NONE,
> +     CONSTRAINT_CPUSET,
> +     CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
> +     CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const oom_constraint_text[] = {
> +     [CONSTRAINT_NONE] = "CONSTRAINT_NONE",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_CPUSET] = "CONSTRAINT_CPUSET",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_MEMCG] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMCG",
> +};

> I've suggested that this should be a separate patch.
I've separate this part in patch v7.

[PATCH v7 1/2] Add an array of const char and enum oom_constraint in
memcontrol.h
On Sat 02-06-18 19:58:51, ufo19890607@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
>>
>> This patch will make some preparation for the follow-up patch: Refactor
>> part of the oom report in dump_header. It puts enum oom_constraint in
>> memcontrol.h and adds an array of const char for each constraint.

> I do not get why you separate this specific part out.
> oom_constraint_text is not used in the patch. It is almost always
> preferable to have a user of newly added functionality.

So do I need to separate this part ?

Thanks