From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"luto@amacapital.net" <luto@amacapital.net>,
wad@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, omosnace@redhat.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:14:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhR241UqLqepaAYNEpt4nRaBr-_BAdEbzQ+yysubywQOyg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALOAHbCJdPdSjU2ab_s=CtAJ6VULpSZUMhEL2bcG0yAmE+quUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:56 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:28 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:07 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > >
> > > Do you have any additional comments or further suggestions?
> >
> > No, I'm still comfortable with my original comments and stand by them.
>
> I understand your perspective, but it seems I have to propose an
> eBPF-based seccomp in the next step.
You likely already know this, but just in case, eBPF-based seccomp has
been proposed many times in the past and has been rejected. I don't
want to dissuade you from doing so again, but I suspect that this use
case will not be compelling enough to be successful.
--
paul-moore.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 12:50 Yafang Shao
2023-12-14 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/5] mm, doc: Add doc for MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING Yafang Shao
2023-12-14 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/5] mm: mempolicy: Revise comment regarding mempolicy mode flags Yafang Shao
2023-12-14 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/5] mm, security: Add lsm hook for memory policy adjustment Yafang Shao
2023-12-14 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 4/5] security: selinux: Implement set_mempolicy hook Yafang Shao
2023-12-14 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for set_mempolicy with a lsm prog Yafang Shao
2023-12-23 0:16 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf Paul Moore
2023-12-24 3:35 ` Yafang Shao
2023-12-24 19:44 ` Paul Moore
2023-12-25 3:12 ` Yafang Shao
2024-01-10 6:06 ` Yafang Shao
2024-01-10 14:28 ` Paul Moore
2024-01-10 15:56 ` Yafang Shao
2024-01-10 16:14 ` Paul Moore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHC9VhR241UqLqepaAYNEpt4nRaBr-_BAdEbzQ+yysubywQOyg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox