From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, ashish.kalra@amd.com, liam.merwick@oracle.com,
david@redhat.com, ackerleytng@google.com, aik@amd.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove preparation tracking
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:13:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGtprH_4K9TAH1DoeAW-UHTpMY2sNr8UUehoCPX_SKSQBNoERQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215153411.3613928-3-michael.roth@amd.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 7:35 AM Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com> wrote:
>
> guest_memfd currently uses the folio uptodate flag to track:
>
> 1) whether or not a page has been cleared before initial usage
> 2) whether or not the architecture hooks have been issued to put the
> page in a private state as defined by the architecture
>
> In practice, 2) is only actually being tracked for SEV-SNP VMs, and
> there do not seem to be any plans/reasons that would suggest this will
> change in the future, so this additional tracking/complexity is not
> really providing any general benefit to guest_memfd users. Future plans
> around in-place conversion and hugepage support, where the per-folio
> uptodate flag is planned to be used purely to track the initial clearing
> of folios, whereas conversion operations could trigger multiple
> transitions between 'prepared' and 'unprepared' and thus need separate
> tracking, will make the burden of tracking this information within
> guest_memfd even more complex, since preparation generally happens
> during fault time, on the "read-side" of any global locks that might
> protect state tracked by guest_memfd, and so may require more complex
> locking schemes to allow for concurrent handling of page faults for
> multiple vCPUs where the "preparedness" state tracked by guest_memfd
> might need to be updated as part of handling the fault.
>
> Instead of keeping this current/future complexity within guest_memfd for
> what is essentially just SEV-SNP, just drop the tracking for 2) and have
> the arch-specific preparation hooks get triggered unconditionally on
> every fault so the arch-specific hooks can check the preparation state
> directly and decide whether or not a folio still needs additional
> preparation. In the case of SEV-SNP, the preparation state is already
> checked again via the preparation hooks to avoid double-preparation, so
> nothing extra needs to be done to update the handling of things there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Tested-By: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-16 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 15:34 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Rework preparation/population flows in prep for in-place conversion Michael Roth
2025-12-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove partial hugepage handling from kvm_gmem_populate() Michael Roth
2025-12-16 0:12 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-16 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-26 2:49 ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove preparation tracking Michael Roth
2025-12-16 0:13 ` Vishal Annapurve [this message]
2025-12-16 3:29 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2025-12-18 22:53 ` Huang, Kai
2025-12-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SEV: Document/enforce page-alignment for KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE Michael Roth
2025-12-16 0:15 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: TDX: Document alignment requirements for KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION Michael Roth
2025-12-16 0:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: guest_memfd: GUP source pages prior to populating guest memory Michael Roth
2025-12-16 0:18 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-18 22:24 ` Huang, Kai
2025-12-26 2:48 ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-26 3:09 ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-18 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Rework preparation/population flows in prep for in-place conversion Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGtprH_4K9TAH1DoeAW-UHTpMY2sNr8UUehoCPX_SKSQBNoERQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox