From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, kasong@tencent.com,
surenb@google.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, yosryahmed@google.com,
yuzhao@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: add per-order mTHP alloc_success and alloc_fail counters
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:29:21 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yyW+HpACCR_HtS4kJzHZRmYqrRaG2nnFktEdVgkutV5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bca6d142-15fd-4af5-9f71-821f891e8305@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:46 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 28.03.24 10:51, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> >
> > Profiling a system blindly with mTHP has become challenging due
> > to the lack of visibility into its operations. Presenting the
> > success rate of mTHP allocations appears to be pressing need.
> >
> > Recently, I've been experiencing significant difficulty debugging
> > performance improvements and regressions without these figures.
> > It's crucial for us to understand the true effectiveness of
> > mTHP in real-world scenarios, especially in systems with
> > fragmented memory.
> >
> > This patch sets up the framework for per-order mTHP counters,
> > starting with the introduction of alloc_success and alloc_fail
> > counters. Incorporating additional counters should now be
> > straightforward as well.
> >
> > The initial two unsigned longs for each event are unused, given
> > that order-0 and order-1 are not mTHP. Nonetheless, this refinement
> > improves code clarity.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > ---
> > -v2:
> > * move to sysfs and provide per-order counters; David, Ryan, Willy
> > -v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240326030103.50678-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
> >
> > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 17 +++++++++++++
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/memory.c | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index e896ca4760f6..27fa26a22a8f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -264,6 +264,23 @@ unsigned long thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > enforce_sysfs, orders);
> > }
> >
> > +enum thp_event_item {
> > + THP_ALLOC_SUCCESS,
> > + THP_ALLOC_FAIL,
> > + NR_THP_EVENT_ITEMS
> > +};
>
> I'm wondering if these should be ANON specific for now. We might want to
> add others (shmem, file) in the future.
I've two ways to do that
1. rename to ANON_THP_ALLOC, so that I can have SHMEM_THP_ALLOC, FILE_THP_ALLOC
in the future;
2. let THP_ALLOC cover all of shmem, file and anon.
following vmstat, actually 1 might be better as we have both THP_FAULT_ALLOC and
THP_FILE_ALLOC for pmd-mapped THP.
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
THP_FAULT_ALLOC,
THP_FAULT_FALLBACK,
THP_FAULT_FALLBACK_CHARGE,
THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC,
THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED,
THP_FILE_ALLOC,
THP_FILE_FALLBACK,
THP_FILE_FALLBACK_CHARGE,
THP_FILE_MAPPED,
THP_SPLIT_PAGE,
THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED,
THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE,
THP_SPLIT_PMD,
THP_SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
THP_SCAN_EXCEED_SWAP_PTE,
THP_SCAN_EXCEED_SHARED_PTE,
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
THP_SPLIT_PUD,
#endif
THP_ZERO_PAGE_ALLOC,
THP_ZERO_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED,
THP_SWPOUT,
THP_SWPOUT_FALLBACK,
#endif
And reading mm/shmem.c, obviously, shmem is using THP_FILE_ALLOC.
I will rename it to ANON_THP_ALLOC in v3, let me know if you disagree :-)
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 9:51 Barry Song
2024-04-01 14:46 ` Yu Zhao
2024-04-01 20:40 ` Barry Song
2024-04-02 8:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-02 9:40 ` Barry Song
2024-04-02 10:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-02 22:14 ` Barry Song
2024-04-03 8:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-02 18:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-02 21:29 ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-04-03 8:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 20:47 ` Barry Song
2024-04-03 8:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-03 8:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 8:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-03 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 21:06 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4yyW+HpACCR_HtS4kJzHZRmYqrRaG2nnFktEdVgkutV5A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox