linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	 Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap()
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:31:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yy5ZNA5PMw5ciUFoL55aboz2FfRf0=FN+yCuZ6eKXR+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410-batch-tlb-flush-v3-4-ff0b9d3a351a@icloud.com>

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 8:47 PM Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
>
> shrink_folio_list() contains a self-contained block that sets up
> TTU flags and calls try_to_unmap(), accounting for failures via
> reclaim_stat. Extract it into folio_try_unmap() to reduce the size
> of shrink_folio_list() and make the unmap step independently readable.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index c8ff742ed891..63cc88c875e8 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,44 @@ static void pageout_one(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *ret_folios,
>                         folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
>  }
>
> +static bool folio_try_unmap(struct folio *folio, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
> +                           unsigned int nr_pages)
> +{
> +       enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> +       bool was_swapbacked;
> +
> +       if (!folio_mapped(folio))
> +               return true;

This is quite odd: the function unmaps, and then if the folio is
not mapped it returns true as “success.” I can’t really
connect that with “success” at all.

Can we move this logic out?

In shrink_folio_list(), we could simply do:
if (!folio_mapped(folio))
      goto activate_locked;

Ensure we only call folio_try_unmap() for folios that
are actually mapped.

> +
> +       was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
> +       if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> +               flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> +       /*
> +        * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> +        * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> +        * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> +        * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> +        * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> +        * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> +        * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> +        * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> +        * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> +        * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> +        */
> +       if (folio_test_large(folio))
> +               flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> +
> +       try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> +       if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> +               stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> +               if (!was_swapbacked &&
> +                   folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> +                       stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Reclaimed folios are counted in stat->nr_reclaimed.
>   */
> @@ -1491,36 +1529,8 @@ static void shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
>                  * The folio is mapped into the page tables of one or more
>                  * processes. Try to unmap it here.
>                  */
> -               if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> -                       enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> -                       bool was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
> -
> -                       if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> -                               flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> -                       /*
> -                        * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> -                        * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> -                        * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> -                        * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> -                        * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> -                        * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> -                        * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> -                        * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> -                        * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> -                        * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> -                        */
> -                       if (folio_test_large(folio))
> -                               flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> -
> -                       try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> -                       if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> -                               stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> -                               if (!was_swapbacked &&
> -                                   folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> -                                       stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> -                               goto activate_locked;
> -                       }
> -               }
> +               if (!folio_try_unmap(folio, stat, nr_pages))
> +                       goto activate_locked;
>
>                 /*
>                  * Folio is unmapped now so it cannot be newly pinned anymore.
>
> --
> 2.43.7

Thanks
Barry


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-11  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10 12:43 [PATCH v3 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-04-10 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/vmscan: track reclaimed pages in reclaim_stat Zhang Peng
2026-04-10 23:58   ` Barry Song
2026-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio activation into folio_active_bounce() Zhang Peng
2026-04-11  0:02   ` Barry Song
2026-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() and pageout_one() Zhang Peng
2026-04-11  0:24   ` Barry Song
2026-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-04-11  0:31   ` Barry Song [this message]
2026-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-04-11  0:34   ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGsJ_4yy5ZNA5PMw5ciUFoL55aboz2FfRf0=FN+yCuZ6eKXR+g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox