linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com,  kasong@tencent.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	 lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	v-songbaohua@oppo.com,  x86@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:09:06 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4xwHVmnKENYV6M6yMSUzeeR8tM7F8mbkAUd4eVHhfN_BA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1f24=3LmQMzgosB0o9OKV-P8f6cPO2ZCPBA64QXQqZYPk=ww@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 6:01 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:38 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> >
> > The try_to_unmap_one() function currently handles PMD-mapped THPs
> > inefficiently. It first splits the PMD into PTEs, copies the dirty
> > state from the PMD to the PTEs, iterates over the PTEs to locate
> > the dirty state, and then marks the THP as swap-backed. This process
> > involves unnecessary PMD splitting and redundant iteration. Instead,
> > this functionality can be efficiently managed in
> > __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), avoiding the extra steps and
> > improving performance.
> >
> > The following microbenchmark redirties folios after invoking MADV_FREE,
> > then measures the time taken to perform memory reclamation (actually
> > set those folios swapbacked again) on the redirtied folios.
> >
> >  #include <stdio.h>
> >  #include <sys/mman.h>
> >  #include <string.h>
> >  #include <time.h>
> >
> >  #define SIZE 128*1024*1024  // 128 MB
> >
> >  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  {
> >         while(1) {
> >                 volatile int *p = mmap(0, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> >                                 MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> >
> >                 memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
> >                 madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_FREE);
> >                 /* redirty after MADV_FREE */
> >                 memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
> >
> >                 clock_t start_time = clock();
> >                 madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT);
> >                 clock_t end_time = clock();
> >
> >                 double elapsed_time = (double)(end_time - start_time) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
> >                 printf("Time taken by reclamation: %f seconds\n", elapsed_time);
> >
> >                 munmap((void *)p, SIZE);
> >         }
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > Testing results are as below,
> > w/o patch:
> > ~ # ./a.out
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007300 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007226 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007295 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007731 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007134 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007285 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007720 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007128 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007710 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007712 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007236 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007690 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007174 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007670 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007169 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007305 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007432 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007158 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.007133 seconds
> > …
> >
> > w/ patch
> >
> > ~ # ./a.out
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002116 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002150 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002261 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002137 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002173 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002063 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002088 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002169 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002111 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002224 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002297 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002260 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002246 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002272 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002277 seconds
> > Time taken by reclamation: 0.002462 seconds
> > …
> >
> > This patch significantly speeds up try_to_unmap_one() by allowing it
> > to skip redirtied THPs without splitting the PMD.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Suggested-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/huge_memory.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >  mm/rmap.c        | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 3d3ebdc002d5..47cc8c3f8f80 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -3070,8 +3070,12 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >         int ref_count, map_count;
> >         pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
> >
> > -       if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> > +       if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> > +               folio_set_dirty(folio);
> > +       if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> > +               folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> >                 return false;
> > +       }
>
> If either the PMD or the folio is dirty, should we just return false right away,
> regardless of VM_DROPPABLE? There’s no need to proceed further in that
> case, IMHO ;)

I don't quite understand you, but we need to proceed to clear pmd entry.
if vm_droppable is true, even if the folio is dirty, we still drop the folio.

>
> Thanks,
> Lance
>
> >
> >         orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
> >
> > @@ -3098,8 +3102,15 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >          *
> >          * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> >          */
> > -       if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> > -           ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> > +       if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> > +               folio_set_dirty(folio);
> > +       if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> > +               folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> > +               set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> > +               return false;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> >                 set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> > @@ -3119,12 +3130,11 @@ bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >  {
> >         VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> >         VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> > +       VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
> > +       VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
> >         VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> >
> > -       if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> > -               return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> > -
> > -       return false;
> > +       return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr, int flags)
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index be1978d2712d..a859c399ec7c 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1724,9 +1724,16 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                 }
> >
> >                 if (!pvmw.pte) {
> > -                       if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > -                                                 folio))
> > -                               goto walk_done;
> > +                       if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
> > +                               if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd, folio))
> > +                                       goto walk_done;
> > +                               /*
> > +                                * unmap_huge_pmd_locked has either already marked
> > +                                * the folio as swap-backed or decided to retain it
> > +                                * due to GUP or speculative references.
> > +                                */
> > +                               goto walk_abort;
> > +                       }
> >
> >                         if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> >                                 /*
> > --
> > 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15  3:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: batched unmap lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-15  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: Set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one Barry Song
2025-01-15  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs Barry Song
2025-01-16  8:30   ` Kefeng Wang
2025-01-15  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-02-04 11:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-05  2:55     ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-05  3:35     ` Barry Song
2025-01-15  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap Barry Song
2025-01-15  5:01   ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15  5:09     ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-01-15  5:41       ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15  6:26       ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15  6:42         ` Barry Song
2025-01-15  7:01           ` Lance Yang
2025-01-17  1:30   ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-18 14:00   ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4xwHVmnKENYV6M6yMSUzeeR8tM7F8mbkAUd4eVHhfN_BA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox