linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	 Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>,
	Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@oppo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] mm: use per_vma lock for MADV_DONTNEED
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:18:25 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4xAhtSxpLTf_foXbtnVWwTcjNuQfCnTYuVwpExbLKjakw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpEaG8WuGboxgc6xB6s5==Lx8QT=UwzgNXJNxDH0-KMqzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 8:17 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 11:43 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Barry,
> >
> > As promised, I enclose a patch to give a sense of how I think we might
> > thread state through this operation.
> >
> > There's a todo on the untagged stuff so you can figure that out. This is
> > based on the v1 so it might not encompass everything you addressed in the
> > v2.
> >
> > Passing in madv_behavior to madvise_walk_vmas() twice kinda sucks, I
> > _despise_ the void *arg function ptr stuff there added just for the anon
> > vma name stuff (ughhh) so might be the only sensible way of threading
> > state.
> >
> > I don't need any attribution, so please use this patch as you see
> > fit/adapt/delete/do whatever with it, just an easier way for me to show the
> > idea!
> >
> > I did some very basic testing and it seems to work, but nothing deeper.
> >
> > Cheers, Lorenzo

Really appreciate your work on this, Lorenzo.

> >
> > ----8<----
> > From ff4ba0115cb31a0630b6f8c02c68f11b3fb71f7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:22:55 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm/madvise: support VMA read locks for MADV_DONTNEED[_LOCKED]
> >
> > Refactor the madvise() code to retain state about the locking mode utilised
> > for traversing VMAs.
> >
> > Then use this mechanism to permit VMA locking to be done later in the
> > madvise() logic and also to allow altering of the locking mode to permit
> > falling back to an mmap read lock if required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/madvise.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> > index 5f7a66a1617e..a3a6d73d0bd5 100644
> > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > @@ -48,38 +48,19 @@ struct madvise_walk_private {
> >         bool pageout;
> >  };
> >
> > +enum madvise_lock_mode {
> > +       MADVISE_NO_LOCK,
> > +       MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK,
> > +       MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK,
> > +       MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct madvise_behavior {
> >         int behavior;
> >         struct mmu_gather *tlb;
> > +       enum madvise_lock_mode lock_mode;
> >  };
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Any behaviour which results in changes to the vma->vm_flags needs to
> > - * take mmap_lock for writing. Others, which simply traverse vmas, need
> > - * to only take it for reading.
> > - */
> > -static int madvise_need_mmap_write(int behavior)
> > -{
> > -       switch (behavior) {
> > -       case MADV_REMOVE:
> > -       case MADV_WILLNEED:
> > -       case MADV_DONTNEED:
> > -       case MADV_DONTNEED_LOCKED:
> > -       case MADV_COLD:
> > -       case MADV_PAGEOUT:
> > -       case MADV_FREE:
> > -       case MADV_POPULATE_READ:
> > -       case MADV_POPULATE_WRITE:
> > -       case MADV_COLLAPSE:
> > -       case MADV_GUARD_INSTALL:
> > -       case MADV_GUARD_REMOVE:
> > -               return 0;
> > -       default:
> > -               /* be safe, default to 1. list exceptions explicitly */
> > -               return 1;
> > -       }
> > -}
> > -
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME
> >  struct anon_vma_name *anon_vma_name_alloc(const char *name)
> >  {
> > @@ -1486,6 +1467,43 @@ static bool process_madvise_remote_valid(int behavior)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Try to acquire a VMA read lock if possible.
> > + *
> > + * We only support this lock over a single VMA, which the input range must
> > + * span.either partially or fully.
> > + *
> > + * This function always returns with an appropriate lock held. If a VMA read
> > + * lock could be acquired, we return the locked VMA.
> > + *
> > + * If a VMA read lock could not be acquired, we return NULL and expect caller to
>
> Worth mentioning that the function itself will fall back to taking
> mmap_read_lock in such a case.
>
> > + * fallback to mmap lock behaviour.
> > + */
> > +static struct vm_area_struct *try_vma_read_lock(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +               struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
> > +               unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +       struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > +
> > +       if (!madv_behavior || madv_behavior->lock_mode != MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK)
>
> nit: I think it would be better to do this check before calling
> try_vma_read_lock(). IMHO it does not make sense to call
> try_vma_read_lock() when lock_mode != MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK. It also
> makes reading this function easier. The first time I looked at it and
> saw "return NULL" in one place that takes mmap_read_lock() and another
> place which returns the same NULL but does not take mmap_lock really
> confused me.
>
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, start);
> > +       if (!vma)
> > +               goto take_mmap_read_lock;
> > +       /* We must span only a single VMA, uffd unsupported. */
> > +       if (end > vma->vm_end || userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
>
> vma->vm_end is not inclusive, so the above condition I think should be
> (end >= vma->vm_end || ...)

I don't quite understand why `end > vma->vm_end` would be a problem.
For a VMA with `vm_start = X` and `vm_end = X + 0x1000`, wouldn't the
range `(X, X + 0x1000)`—where `end == vm_end`—still be a valid
candidate for using a per-VMA lock?

We're checking which cases are not eligible for per-VMA locking,
not which ones are.

>
> > +               vma_end_read(vma);
> > +               goto take_mmap_read_lock;
> > +       }
> > +       return vma;
> > +
> > +take_mmap_read_lock:
> > +       mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > +       madv_behavior->lock_mode = MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK;
> > +       return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Walk the vmas in range [start,end), and call the visit function on each one.
> >   * The visit function will get start and end parameters that cover the overlap
> > @@ -1496,7 +1514,8 @@ static bool process_madvise_remote_valid(int behavior)
> >   */
> >  static
> >  int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> > -                     unsigned long end, void *arg,
> > +                     unsigned long end, struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
> > +                     void *arg,
> >                       int (*visit)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                                    struct vm_area_struct **prev, unsigned long start,
> >                                    unsigned long end, void *arg))
> > @@ -1505,6 +1524,15 @@ int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> >         struct vm_area_struct *prev;
> >         unsigned long tmp;
> >         int unmapped_error = 0;
> > +       int error;
> > +
> > +       /* If VMA read lock supported, we apply advice to a single VMA only. */
> > +       vma = try_vma_read_lock(mm, madv_behavior, start, end);
> > +       if (vma) {
> > +               error = visit(vma, &prev, start, end, arg);
> > +               vma_end_read(vma);
> > +               return error;
> > +       }
> >
> >         /*
> >          * If the interval [start,end) covers some unmapped address
> > @@ -1516,8 +1544,6 @@ int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> >                 prev = vma;
> >
> >         for (;;) {
> > -               int error;
> > -
> >                 /* Still start < end. */
> >                 if (!vma)
> >                         return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -1598,34 +1624,86 @@ int madvise_set_anon_name(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> >         if (end == start)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > -       return madvise_walk_vmas(mm, start, end, anon_name,
> > +       return madvise_walk_vmas(mm, start, end, anon_name, NULL,

I think this should be:

 +       return madvise_walk_vmas(mm, start, end, NULL, anon_name,

> >                                  madvise_vma_anon_name);
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME */
> >
> > -static int madvise_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, int behavior)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Any behaviour which results in changes to the vma->vm_flags needs to
> > + * take mmap_lock for writing. Others, which simply traverse vmas, need
> > + * to only take it for reading.
> > + */
> > +static enum madvise_lock_mode get_lock_mode(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
> >  {
> > +       int behavior = madv_behavior->behavior;
> > +
> >         if (is_memory_failure(behavior))
> > -               return 0;
> > +               return MADVISE_NO_LOCK;
> >
> > -       if (madvise_need_mmap_write(behavior)) {
> > +       switch (behavior) {
> > +       case MADV_REMOVE:
> > +       case MADV_WILLNEED:
> > +       case MADV_COLD:
> > +       case MADV_PAGEOUT:
> > +       case MADV_FREE:
> > +       case MADV_POPULATE_READ:
> > +       case MADV_POPULATE_WRITE:
> > +       case MADV_COLLAPSE:
> > +       case MADV_GUARD_INSTALL:
> > +       case MADV_GUARD_REMOVE:
> > +               return MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK;
> > +       case MADV_DONTNEED:
> > +       case MADV_DONTNEED_LOCKED:
> > +               return MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK;
> > +       default:
> > +               return MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK;
> > +       }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int madvise_lock(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +               struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
> > +{
> > +       enum madvise_lock_mode lock_mode = get_lock_mode(madv_behavior);
> > +
> > +       switch (lock_mode) {
> > +       case MADVISE_NO_LOCK:
> > +               break;
> > +       case MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK:
> >                 if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
> >                         return -EINTR;
> > -       } else {
> > +               break;
> > +       case MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK:
> >                 mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > +               break;
> > +       case MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK:
> > +               /* We will acquire the lock per-VMA in madvise_walk_vmas(). */
> > +               break;
> >         }
> > +
> > +       madv_behavior->lock_mode = lock_mode;
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void madvise_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm, int behavior)
> > +static void madvise_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +               struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
> >  {
> > -       if (is_memory_failure(behavior))
> > +       switch (madv_behavior->lock_mode) {
> > +       case  MADVISE_NO_LOCK:
> >                 return;
> > -
> > -       if (madvise_need_mmap_write(behavior))
> > +       case MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK:
> >                 mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> > -       else
> > +               break;
> > +       case MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK:
> >                 mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > +               break;
> > +       case MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK:
> > +               /* We will drop the lock per-VMA in madvise_walk_vmas(). */
> > +               break;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       madv_behavior->lock_mode = MADVISE_NO_LOCK;
> >  }
> >
> >  static bool madvise_batch_tlb_flush(int behavior)
> > @@ -1721,6 +1799,8 @@ static int madvise_do_behavior(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >
> >         if (is_memory_failure(behavior))
> >                 return madvise_inject_error(behavior, start, start + len_in);
> > +
> > +       // TODO: handle untagged stuff here...
> >         start = untagged_addr(start); //untagged_addr_remote(mm, start);
> >         end = start + PAGE_ALIGN(len_in);
> >
> > @@ -1729,7 +1809,7 @@ static int madvise_do_behavior(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                 error = madvise_populate(mm, start, end, behavior);
> >         else
> >                 error = madvise_walk_vmas(mm, start, end, madv_behavior,
> > -                                         madvise_vma_behavior);
> > +                                         madv_behavior, madvise_vma_behavior);
> >         blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> >         return error;
> >  }
> > @@ -1817,13 +1897,13 @@ int do_madvise(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, size_t len_in, int beh
> >
> >         if (madvise_should_skip(start, len_in, behavior, &error))
> >                 return error;
> > -       error = madvise_lock(mm, behavior);
> > +       error = madvise_lock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> >         if (error)
> >                 return error;
> >         madvise_init_tlb(&madv_behavior, mm);
> >         error = madvise_do_behavior(mm, start, len_in, &madv_behavior);
> >         madvise_finish_tlb(&madv_behavior);
> > -       madvise_unlock(mm, behavior);
> > +       madvise_unlock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> >
> >         return error;
> >  }
> > @@ -1847,7 +1927,7 @@ static ssize_t vector_madvise(struct mm_struct *mm, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >
> >         total_len = iov_iter_count(iter);
> >
> > -       ret = madvise_lock(mm, behavior);
> > +       ret = madvise_lock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> >         if (ret)
> >                 return ret;
> >         madvise_init_tlb(&madv_behavior, mm);
> > @@ -1880,8 +1960,8 @@ static ssize_t vector_madvise(struct mm_struct *mm, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >
> >                         /* Drop and reacquire lock to unwind race. */
> >                         madvise_finish_tlb(&madv_behavior);
> > -                       madvise_unlock(mm, behavior);
> > -                       ret = madvise_lock(mm, behavior);
> > +                       madvise_unlock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> > +                       ret = madvise_lock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> >                         if (ret)
> >                                 goto out;
> >                         madvise_init_tlb(&madv_behavior, mm);
> > @@ -1892,7 +1972,7 @@ static ssize_t vector_madvise(struct mm_struct *mm, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >                 iov_iter_advance(iter, iter_iov_len(iter));
> >         }
> >         madvise_finish_tlb(&madv_behavior);
> > -       madvise_unlock(mm, behavior);
> > +       madvise_unlock(mm, &madv_behavior);
> >
> >  out:
> >         ret = (total_len - iov_iter_count(iter)) ? : ret;
> > --
> > 2.49.0

Thanks
Barry


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-30 10:44 Barry Song
2025-05-30 14:06 ` Jann Horn
2025-05-30 14:34   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 20:17     ` Barry Song
2025-06-02 17:35       ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-02 17:53         ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-30 20:40     ` Jann Horn
2025-06-02 11:50       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-03  1:06         ` Barry Song
2025-06-03  9:48           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-03  7:06       ` Barry Song
2025-06-03 16:52         ` Jann Horn
2025-06-05 10:27           ` Barry Song
2025-05-30 22:00   ` Barry Song
2025-06-02 14:55     ` Jann Horn
2025-06-03  7:51       ` Barry Song
2025-06-03  7:24   ` Qi Zheng
2025-06-03  9:54     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-04  6:02       ` Qi Zheng
2025-06-04 17:50         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-05  3:23           ` Qi Zheng
2025-06-05 14:04             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-06  3:55               ` Qi Zheng
2025-06-06 10:44                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-09  6:40                   ` Qi Zheng
2025-06-09 15:08                     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-10  7:20                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-06 11:07           ` Jann Horn
2025-06-03 18:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-03 20:17   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-04  5:22     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-06  7:18     ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-06-06 10:16       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-03 20:59   ` Pedro Falcato
2025-06-04  5:23     ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4xAhtSxpLTf_foXbtnVWwTcjNuQfCnTYuVwpExbLKjakw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox