From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
hanchuanhua@oppo.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, kasong@tencent.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
v-songbaohua@oppo.com, ziy@nvidia.com, yuanshuai@oppo.com,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: collect the number of anon large folios on split_deferred list
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 06:01:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4x4ngLS4kW-e7_DTykZSAmk3DeQ6CuZ4zGEiGBd99fbrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c01b794-7c51-4d90-a215-210ac21401d2@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 5:39 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 12.08.24 00:49, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> >
> > When an mTHP is added to the deferred_list, its partial pages
> > are unused, leading to wasted memory and potentially increasing
> > memory reclamation pressure.
> >
> > Detailing the specifics of how unmapping occurs is quite difficult
> > and not that useful, so we adopt a simple approach: each time an
> > mTHP enters the deferred_list, we increment the count by 1; whenever
> > it leaves for any reason, we decrement the count by 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 5 +++++
> > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 1 +
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> > index 9fdfb46e4560..7072469de8a8 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
> > @@ -532,6 +532,11 @@ nr_anon
> > These huge pages could be entirely mapped or have partially
> > unmapped/unused subpages.
> >
> > +nr_split_deferred
> > + the number of anon huge pages which have been partially unmapped
> > + and put onto split queue. Those unmapped subpages are also unused
> > + and temporarily wasting memory.
>
> The name suggests something else ... like a counter of how many have
> been deferred split :)
>
> Would "nr_anon_partially_mapped" "nr_anon_split_pending" (or something
> less mouthful) be clearer?
>
> (likely "anon" really should be part of the name in any case)
>
> The name we chose (and the implied semantics) will likely have
> implications on the handling of Usamas series.
>
Hi David,
Your point is quite similar to my V1, though not exactly the same. I aimed to
make the name more meaningful for users.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240808010457.228753-3-21cnbao@gmail.com/
Ryan felt that the name should be consistent with the existing split_deferred.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/36e8f1be-868d-4bce-8f32-e2d96b8b7af3@arm.com/#t
It seems that the existing split_deferred may now be less optimal with
Usama's series, as entirely_mapped folios might also be on the list.
Ryan is out right now, but I suppose he will be convinced that
"nr_anon_partially_mapped" is probably a better name once
he returns and reviews Usama's series. :-)
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-11 22:49 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP Barry Song
2024-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: collect the number of anon large folios Barry Song
2024-08-21 21:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22 0:52 ` Barry Song
2024-08-22 8:44 ` Barry Song
2024-08-22 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22 9:21 ` Barry Song
2024-08-22 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-22 10:12 ` Barry Song
2024-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: collect the number of anon large folios on split_deferred list Barry Song
2024-08-21 21:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-21 22:01 ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-08-21 22:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-18 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP Barry Song
2024-08-19 2:44 ` Usama Arif
2024-08-19 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 8:33 ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 8:52 ` Barry Song
2024-08-19 14:22 ` Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4x4ngLS4kW-e7_DTykZSAmk3DeQ6CuZ4zGEiGBd99fbrw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hanchuanhua@oppo.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=yuanshuai@oppo.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox