linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: david@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,  chrisl@kernel.org,
	kasong@tencent.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,  lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,  x86@kernel.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com, zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:46:37 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4w5Obx9=P0wkrbLaDzKpG0e-7xs7jgHRa91KO7e92MO8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626092905.31305-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 9:29 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> +
> +               /*
> +                * If we are sure that we batched the entire folio and cleared
> +                * all PTEs, we can just optimize and stop right here.
> +                */
> +               if (nr_pages == folio_nr_pages(folio))

David also mentioned if (nr_pages > 1 && nr_pages == folio_nr_pages(folio)).
I assume it’s still fine when nr_pages == 1 for small folios? No?

>                         goto walk_done;
>                 continue;
>  walk_abort:
> --
>

Thanks,
Lance


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  9:30 [PATCH v4 0/4] mm: batched unmap " Barry Song
2025-02-14  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: Set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one Barry Song
2025-02-14  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs Barry Song
2025-02-14  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-06-24 12:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 15:26     ` Lance Yang
2025-06-24 15:34       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 16:25         ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25  9:38           ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 10:00           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 10:38             ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 10:43               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 10:49                 ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 10:59                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 10:47             ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25 10:49               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 10:57               ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 11:01                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 11:15                   ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 11:27                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 11:42                       ` Barry Song
2025-06-25 12:09                         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 12:20                           ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25 12:25                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 12:35                               ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25 21:03                               ` Barry Song
2025-06-26  1:17                                 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-26  8:17                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-26  9:29                                     ` Lance Yang
2025-06-26 12:44                                       ` Lance Yang
2025-06-26 13:16                                         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-26 13:52                                           ` Lance Yang
2025-06-26 14:39                                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-26 15:06                                               ` Lance Yang
2025-06-26 21:46                                       ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-06-26 21:52                                         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 12:58                           ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25 13:02                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25  8:44         ` Lance Yang
2025-06-25  9:29           ` Lance Yang
2025-07-01 10:03   ` Harry Yoo
2025-07-01 13:27     ` Harry Yoo
2025-07-01 16:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-14  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap Barry Song
2025-06-25 13:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] mm: batched unmap lazyfree large folios during reclamation Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGsJ_4w5Obx9=P0wkrbLaDzKpG0e-7xs7jgHRa91KO7e92MO8g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox