linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: usamaarif642@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 chengming.zhou@linux.dev, david@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	 hughd@google.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	nphamcs@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,  willy@infradead.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com, hanchuanhua@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: store zero pages to be swapped out in a bitmap
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 19:17:17 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4w2k=704mgtQu97y5Qpidc-x+ZBmBXCytkzdcasfAaG0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkYNn51b3wQbNnJoy8TMVA+r+ookuZzNEEpYWwKiZPVRdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:12 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > @@ -426,6 +515,26 @@ static void sio_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
> > >         mempool_free(sio, sio_pool);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static bool swap_read_folio_zeromap(struct folio *folio)
> > > +{
> > > +       unsigned int idx = swap_zeromap_folio_test(folio);
> > > +
> > > +       if (idx == 0)
> > > +               return false;
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * Swapping in a large folio that is partially in the zeromap is not
> > > +        * currently handled. Return true without marking the folio uptodate so
> > > +        * that an IO error is emitted (e.g. do_swap_page() will sigbus).
> > > +        */
> > > +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx < folio_nr_pages(folio)))
> > > +               return true;
> >
> > Hi Usama, Yosry,
> >
> > I feel the warning is wrong as we could have the case where idx==0
> > is not zeromap but idx=1 is zeromap. idx == 0 doesn't necessarily
> > mean we should return false.
>
> Good catch. Yeah if idx == 0 is not in the zeromap but other indices
> are we will mistakenly read the entire folio from swap.
>
> >
> > What about the below change which both fixes the warning and unblocks
> > large folios swap-in?
>
> But I don't see how that unblocks the large folios swap-in work? We
> still need to actually handle the case where a large folio being
> swapped in is partially in the zeromap. Right now we warn and unlock
> the folio without calling folio_mark_uptodate(), which emits an IO
> error.

I placed this in mm/swap.h so that during swap-in, it can filter out any large
folios where swap_zeromap_entries_count() is greater than 0 and less than
nr.

I believe this case would be quite rare, as it can only occur when some small
folios that are swapped out happen to have contiguous and aligned swap
slots.

>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
> > index 4bc77d1c6bfa..7d7ff7064e2b 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_io.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> > @@ -226,26 +226,6 @@ static void swap_zeromap_folio_clear(struct folio *folio)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Return the index of the first subpage which is not zero-filled
> > - * according to swap_info_struct->zeromap.
> > - * If all pages are zero-filled according to zeromap, it will return
> > - * folio_nr_pages(folio).
> > - */
> > -static unsigned int swap_zeromap_folio_test(struct folio *folio)
> > -{
> > -       struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
> > -       swp_entry_t entry;
> > -       unsigned int i;
> > -
> > -       for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
> > -               entry = page_swap_entry(folio_page(folio, i));
> > -               if (!test_bit(swp_offset(entry), sis->zeromap))
> > -                       return i;
> > -       }
> > -       return i;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /*
> >   * We may have stale swap cache pages in memory: notice
> >   * them here and get rid of the unnecessary final write.
> > @@ -524,9 +504,10 @@ static void sio_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
> >
> >  static bool swap_read_folio_zeromap(struct folio *folio)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned int idx = swap_zeromap_folio_test(folio);
> > +       unsigned int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> > +       unsigned int nr = swap_zeromap_entries_count(folio->swap, nr_pages);
> >
> > -       if (idx == 0)
> > +       if (nr == 0)
> >                 return false;
> >
> >         /*
> > @@ -534,7 +515,7 @@ static bool swap_read_folio_zeromap(struct folio *folio)
> >          * currently handled. Return true without marking the folio uptodate so
> >          * that an IO error is emitted (e.g. do_swap_page() will sigbus).
> >          */
> > -       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx < folio_nr_pages(folio)))
> > +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr < nr_pages))
> >                 return true;
> >
> >         folio_zero_range(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> > index f8711ff82f84..2d59e9d89e95 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.h
> > +++ b/mm/swap.h
> > @@ -80,6 +80,32 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
> >  {
> >         return swp_swap_info(folio->swap)->flags;
> >  }
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Return the number of entries which are zero-filled according to
> > + * swap_info_struct->zeromap. It isn't precise if the return value
> > + * is larger than 0 and smaller than nr to avoid extra iterations,
> > + * In this case, it means entries haven't consistent zeromap.
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned int swap_zeromap_entries_count(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
> > +{
> > +       struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(entry);
> > +       unsigned long offset = swp_offset(entry);
> > +       unsigned int type = swp_type(entry);
> > +       unsigned int n = 0;
> > +
> > +       for (int i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> > +               entry = swp_entry(type, offset + i);
> > +               if (test_bit(offset + i, sis->zeromap)) {
> > +                       if (i != n)
> > +                               return i;
> > +                       n++;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return n;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
> >  struct swap_iocb;
> >  static inline void swap_read_folio(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
> > @@ -171,6 +197,11 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned int swap_zeromap_entries_count(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
> > +{
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
> >
> >  #endif /* _MM_SWAP_H */
> >
> > > +
> > > +       folio_zero_fill(folio);
> > > +       folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> > > +       return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void swap_read_folio_fs(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
> > >  {
> > >         struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
> > > @@ -515,8 +624,9 @@ void swap_read_folio(struct folio *folio, bool synchronous,
> > >                 psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
> > >         }
> > >         delayacct_swapin_start();
> > > -
> > > -       if (zswap_load(folio)) {
> > > +       if (swap_read_folio_zeromap(folio)) {
> > > +               folio_unlock(folio);
> > > +       } else if (zswap_load(folio)) {
> > >                 folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> > >                 folio_unlock(folio);
> > >         } else if (data_race(sis->flags & SWP_FS_OPS)) {
> > > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> > > index f1e559e216bd..48d8dca0b94b 100644
> > > --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> > > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> > > @@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ static unsigned int cluster_list_del_first(struct swap_cluster_list *list,
> > >  static void swap_cluster_schedule_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> > >                 unsigned int idx)
> > >  {
> > > +       unsigned int i;
> > > +
> > >         /*
> > >          * If scan_swap_map_slots() can't find a free cluster, it will check
> > >          * si->swap_map directly. To make sure the discarding cluster isn't
> > > @@ -461,6 +463,13 @@ static void swap_cluster_schedule_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> > >          */
> > >         memset(si->swap_map + idx * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER,
> > >                         SWAP_MAP_BAD, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * zeromap can see updates from concurrent swap_writepage() and swap_read_folio()
> > > +        * call on other slots, hence use atomic clear_bit for zeromap instead of the
> > > +        * non-atomic bitmap_clear.
> > > +        */
> > > +       for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++)
> > > +               clear_bit(idx * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER + i, si->zeromap);
> > >
> > >         cluster_list_add_tail(&si->discard_clusters, si->cluster_info, idx);
> > >
> > > @@ -482,7 +491,7 @@ static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long idx)
> > >  static void swap_do_scheduled_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si)
> > >  {
> > >         struct swap_cluster_info *info, *ci;
> > > -       unsigned int idx;
> > > +       unsigned int idx, i;
> > >
> > >         info = si->cluster_info;
> > >
> > > @@ -498,6 +507,8 @@ static void swap_do_scheduled_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si)
> > >                 __free_cluster(si, idx);
> > >                 memset(si->swap_map + idx * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER,
> > >                                 0, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> > > +               for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++)
> > > +                       clear_bit(idx * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER + i, si->zeromap);
> > >                 unlock_cluster(ci);
> > >         }
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1059,9 +1070,12 @@ static void swap_free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long idx)
> > >  {
> > >         unsigned long offset = idx * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
> > >         struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
> > > +       unsigned int i;
> > >
> > >         ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
> > >         memset(si->swap_map + offset, 0, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> > > +       for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++)
> > > +               clear_bit(offset + i, si->zeromap);
> > >         cluster_set_count_flag(ci, 0, 0);
> > >         free_cluster(si, idx);
> > >         unlock_cluster(ci);
> > > @@ -1336,6 +1350,7 @@ static void swap_entry_free(struct swap_info_struct *p, swp_entry_t entry)
> > >         count = p->swap_map[offset];
> > >         VM_BUG_ON(count != SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
> > >         p->swap_map[offset] = 0;
> > > +       clear_bit(offset, p->zeromap);
> > >         dec_cluster_info_page(p, p->cluster_info, offset);
> > >         unlock_cluster(ci);
> > >
> > > @@ -2597,6 +2612,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> > >         free_percpu(p->cluster_next_cpu);
> > >         p->cluster_next_cpu = NULL;
> > >         vfree(swap_map);
> > > +       bitmap_free(p->zeromap);
> > >         kvfree(cluster_info);
> > >         /* Destroy swap account information */
> > >         swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
> > > @@ -3123,6 +3139,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
> > >                 goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > +       p->zeromap = bitmap_zalloc(maxpages, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +       if (!p->zeromap) {
> > > +               error = -ENOMEM;
> > > +               goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > >         if (p->bdev && bdev_stable_writes(p->bdev))
> > >                 p->flags |= SWP_STABLE_WRITES;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >

Thanks
barry


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-12 12:43 [PATCH v4 0/2] " Usama Arif
2024-06-12 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Usama Arif
2024-06-12 20:13   ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-13 11:37     ` Usama Arif
2024-06-13 16:38       ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-13 19:21         ` Usama Arif
2024-06-13 19:26           ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-13 19:38             ` Usama Arif
2024-09-04  5:55   ` Barry Song
2024-09-04  7:12     ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-04  7:17       ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-09-04  7:22         ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-04  7:54           ` Barry Song
2024-09-04 17:40             ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-05  7:03               ` Barry Song
2024-09-05  7:55                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-05  8:49                   ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 10:10                     ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 10:33                       ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 10:53                         ` Usama Arif
2024-09-05 11:00                           ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 19:19                             ` Usama Arif
2024-09-05 17:36                         ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-05 19:28                         ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-06 10:22                           ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 10:37                       ` Usama Arif
2024-09-05 10:42                         ` Barry Song
2024-09-05 10:50                           ` Usama Arif
2024-09-04 11:14     ` Usama Arif
2024-09-04 23:44       ` Barry Song
2024-09-04 23:47         ` Barry Song
2024-09-04 23:57         ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-09-05  0:29           ` Barry Song
2024-09-05  7:38             ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-12 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: remove code to handle same filled pages Usama Arif
2024-06-12 15:09   ` Nhat Pham
2024-06-12 16:34     ` Usama Arif

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGsJ_4w2k=704mgtQu97y5Qpidc-x+ZBmBXCytkzdcasfAaG0w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hanchuanhua@oppo.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox