From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, liuhailong@oppo.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, nathan@kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
surenb@google.com, zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com,
quic_charante@quicinc.com, yuzhao@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "mm: skip CMA pages when they are not available"
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:09:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4w0EHuAwvSFuqUsMO-bLjJwCmN_qjL6NuA043-4rgfgsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZflTCY-Oaxm0U70u@tiehlicka>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri 15-03-24 16:18:03, liuhailong@oppo.com wrote:
> > From: "Hailong.Liu" <liuhailong@oppo.com>
> >
> > This reverts
> > commit b7108d66318a ("Multi-gen LRU: skip CMA pages when they are not eligible")
> > commit 5da226dbfce3 ("mm: skip CMA pages when they are not available")
> >
> > skip_cma may cause system not responding. if cma pages is large in lru_list
> > and system is in lowmemory, many tasks would direct reclaim and waste
> > cpu time to isolate_lru_pages and return.
> >
> > Test this patch on android-5.15 8G device
> > reproducer:
> > - cma_declare_contiguous 3G pages
> > - set /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 0 to enable direct_reclaim reclaim file
> > only.
> > - run a memleak process in userspace
>
> Does this represent a sane configuration? CMA memory is unusable for
> kernel allocations and memleak process is also hard to reclaim due to
> swap suppression. Isn't such a system doomed to struggle to reclaim any
> memory? Btw. how does the same setup behave with the regular LRU
> implementation? My guess would be that it would struggle as well.
I assume the regular LRU implementation you are talking about is the LRU
without skip_cma()?
I remember Hailong mentioned something like " it also trigger memory psi
event to allow admin do something to release memory" and " without
patch the devices would kill camera process". So it seems the difference
is if a killing will occur.
Hailong, would you like to provide more detail?
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 14:15 [PATCH] " liuhailong
2024-03-14 17:47 ` Yu Zhao
2024-03-15 7:41 ` reply: " 黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang)
2024-03-15 10:36 ` 刘海龙(LaoLiu)
2024-03-15 8:18 ` [PATCH v2] " liuhailong
2024-03-15 8:46 ` Barry Song
2024-03-15 10:43 ` 刘海龙(LaoLiu)
2024-03-17 5:47 ` Barry Song
2024-03-19 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2024-03-19 11:09 ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-03-19 12:27 ` 刘海龙(LaoLiu)
2024-03-22 1:25 ` Barry Song
2024-03-19 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2024-03-22 1:28 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4w0EHuAwvSFuqUsMO-bLjJwCmN_qjL6NuA043-4rgfgsQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuhailong@oppo.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox