From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx153.postini.com [74.125.245.153]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7386A6B005D for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 07:04:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so5405570oag.14 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:04:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> References: <20121025121617.617683848@chello.nl> <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:04:04 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches From: Alex Shi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar > > In reality, this report is larger but I chopped it down a bit for > brevity. autonuma beats schednuma *heavily* on this benchmark both in > terms of average operations per numa node and overall throughput. > > SPECJBB PEAKS > 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0 > rc2-stats-v2r1 rc2-autonuma-v27r8 rc2-schednuma-v1r3 > Expctd Warehouse 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) > Expctd Peak Bops 442225.00 ( 0.00%) 596039.00 ( 34.78%) 555342.00 ( 25.58%) > Actual Warehouse 7.00 ( 0.00%) 9.00 ( 28.57%) 8.00 ( 14.29%) > Actual Peak Bops 550747.00 ( 0.00%) 646124.00 ( 17.32%) 560635.00 ( 1.80%) It is impressive report! Could you like to share the what JVM and options are you using in the testing, and based on which kinds of platform? -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org