Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] mm: memcg: put memcg1-specific struct mem_cgroup's members under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1

[Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 4:35 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:48:54 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> > > -   /* For oom notifier event fd */
> > > -   struct list_head oom_notify;
> > > -
> > > -   /*
> > > -    * Should we move charges of a task when a task is moved into this
> > > -    * mem_cgroup ? And what type of charges should we move ?
> > > -    */
> > > -   unsigned long move_charge_at_immigrate;
> > > -   /* taken only while moving_account > 0 */
> > > -   spinlock_t              move_lock;
> > > -   unsigned long           move_lock_flags;
> > > -
> > >     CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad1_);
> >
> > Let's also remove these _pad1_ and also _pad2_ as well as this
> > rearrangement nullifies the reasons behind these paddings. We need to
> > run some perf benchmarks to identify the newer false cache sharing
> > ields.
>
> I guess this is going to be a followup patch (please).

Already posted [1] and has been picked.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240701185932.704807-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev/