From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Aleksei Nikiforov <aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/kmsan: Fix kmsan kmalloc hook when no stack depots are allocated yet
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:43:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=XM_HRovM+VanVsNoi2ug1HQ1yx8oBhYAj0sVDJsh0nfQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930115600.709776-2-aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 1:56 PM Aleksei Nikiforov
<aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> If no stack depot is allocated yet,
> due to masking out __GFP_RECLAIM flags
> kmsan called from kmalloc cannot allocate stack depot.
> kmsan fails to record origin and report issues.
>
> Reusing flags from kmalloc without modifying them should be safe for kmsan.
> For example, such chain of calls is possible:
> test_uninit_kmalloc -> kmalloc -> __kmalloc_cache_noprof ->
> slab_alloc_node -> slab_post_alloc_hook ->
> kmsan_slab_alloc -> kmsan_internal_poison_memory.
>
> Only when it is called in a context without flags present
> should __GFP_RECLAIM flags be masked.
>
> With this change all kmsan tests start working reliably.
I think this makes sense. The whole __GFP_RECLAIM filtering was mostly
for poisoning local variables, so we don't need it for allocation
hooks.
It is still possible to pass __GFP_RECLAIM to kmsan_poison_memory(), but:
- it is actually not used in the entire codebase;
- the documentation clearly states that kmsan_poison_memory() will be
allocating memory, so one should be mindful of passing wrong GFP
flags.
> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Nikiforov <aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 11:56 Aleksei Nikiforov
2025-10-09 3:31 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-10 8:07 ` Aleksei Nikiforov
2025-10-22 3:02 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-22 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-23 1:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-31 11:57 ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-10-22 9:43 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAG_fn=XM_HRovM+VanVsNoi2ug1HQ1yx8oBhYAj0sVDJsh0nfQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=glider@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksei.nikiforov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox