From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
sjpark@amazon.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:04:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=X5ZwMLC9OJaMzcV2WpRgxHyfSeb+0A+1rPYcRYu27V=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929142752.GD53442@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:28 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable
> > KFENCE for the arm64 architecture. In particular, this implements the
> > required interface in <asm/kfence.h>. Currently, the arm64 version does
> > not yet use a statically allocated memory pool, at the cost of a pointer
> > load for each is_kfence_address().
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > ---
> > For ARM64, we would like to solicit feedback on what the best option is
> > to obtain a constant address for __kfence_pool. One option is to declare
> > a memory range in the memory layout to be dedicated to KFENCE (like is
> > done for KASAN), however, it is unclear if this is the best available
> > option. We would like to avoid touching the memory layout.
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++
> > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index 6d232837cbee..1acc6b2877c3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ config ARM64
> > select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
> > select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN if !(ARM64_16K_PAGES && ARM64_VA_BITS_48)
> > select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS if HAVE_ARCH_KASAN
> > + select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE if (!ARM64_16K_PAGES && !ARM64_64K_PAGES)
> > select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
> > select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS
> > select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS if COMPAT
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..608dde80e5ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASM_KFENCE_H
> > +#define __ASM_KFENCE_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kfence.h>
> > +#include <linux/log2.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > +
> > +#define KFENCE_SKIP_ARCH_FAULT_HANDLER "el1_sync"
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * FIXME: Support HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE_STATIC_POOL: Use the statically allocated
> > + * __kfence_pool, to avoid the extra pointer load for is_kfence_address(). By
> > + * default, however, we do not have struct pages for static allocations.
> > + */
> > +
> > +static inline bool arch_kfence_initialize_pool(void)
> > +{
> > + const unsigned int num_pages = ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(KFENCE_POOL_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE));
> > + struct page *pages = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, num_pages);
> > +
> > + if (!pages)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + __kfence_pool = page_address(pages);
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool kfence_protect_page(unsigned long addr, bool protect)
> > +{
> > + set_memory_valid(addr, 1, !protect);
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> This is only safe if the linear map is force ot page granularity. That's
> the default with rodata=full, but this is not always the case, so this
> will need some interaction with the MMU setup in arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c.
On x86 we ensure this by reallocating the necessary page tables.
But looks like your suggestion is what we need for arm64 as long as we
also want virt_to_page() to work for our pool.
It's still unclear to me whether a carveout you suggest can be placed
at a fixed (known at link time) address, as the main point of this
dance is to remove memory accesses from is_kfence_addr().
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 13:26 [PATCH v3 00/10] KFENCE: A low-overhead sampling-based memory safety error detector Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure Marco Elver
2020-09-25 11:23 ` SeongJae Park
2020-09-25 11:31 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 12:42 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-09-29 13:11 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:48 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-09-29 13:49 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 14:01 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-09-29 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-29 14:51 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 15:05 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-05 16:00 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-05 16:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-09-29 15:51 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-01 18:11 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] x86, kfence: enable KFENCE for x86 Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64 Marco Elver
2020-09-21 14:31 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-21 14:58 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-21 15:37 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-21 17:43 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 9:56 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:53 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-29 16:52 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-25 15:25 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-29 14:02 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-01 11:24 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-01 17:57 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-08 9:40 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-08 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-14 19:12 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-15 13:39 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-15 14:15 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-28 11:53 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-29 17:04 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLAB Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] kfence, kasan: make KFENCE compatible with KASAN Marco Elver
2020-09-29 12:20 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-09-29 13:13 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] kfence, kmemleak: make KFENCE compatible with KMEMLEAK Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] kfence, lockdep: make KFENCE compatible with lockdep Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] kfence, Documentation: add KFENCE documentation Marco Elver
2020-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] kfence: add test suite Marco Elver
2020-09-21 17:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-21 17:37 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-21 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] KFENCE: A low-overhead sampling-based memory safety error detector Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAG_fn=X5ZwMLC9OJaMzcV2WpRgxHyfSeb+0A+1rPYcRYu27V=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=glider@google.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox