linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Emanuel Czirai <correabuscar+kernAlbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 217191] New: test_meminit: failures: 70 out of 130 / reference already released.
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:29:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=X3V=LKnGhAaeGkkzo9A_OpWckWKCqBWKhr5p3Jxv4T1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFjaU5sFgMLtLYW-5DoQOsAmntHq9BG2MX4JSeP7XZpZmXgEEw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]

>
>
>
>
>> May I ask what is the purpose of the config in question?
>>
> it's what I use on my home desktop PC(but merged the laptop .config into
> it, didn't have the time to test it on laptop so far yet) and I've enabled
> all tests to catch things early in the hopes of avoiding some potential
> btrfs filesystem corruption(for a third time, so far) if nothing else...
> but otherwise it'd be just reassuring to know that things are performing
> within their expected parameters (with tests passing and all). I don't
> remember why I've tried to keep modules at a minimum though.
>

I see, thanks for the explanation.
I think many tests in lib/ may produce strange warnings that are meant to
be parsed by human devs that know what to expect.
It would be nice to have them converted to KUNIT, but that's a long way to
go.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1412 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-217191-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2023-03-14 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2023-03-15 13:57   ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-15 17:22     ` Emanuel Attila Czirai
2023-03-15 17:46       ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-15 22:33         ` Emanuel Czirai
2023-03-16  9:29           ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG_fn=X3V=LKnGhAaeGkkzo9A_OpWckWKCqBWKhr5p3Jxv4T1A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=glider@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=correabuscar+kernAlbugs@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox