From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: security: introduce CONFIG_INIT_HEAP_ALL
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:04:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=VYa0CtxDeXOV0Mpj3q_i150NJioyJWGLA3OEij3iSH1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35935775-1c0d-6016-5bb3-0abee65a7492@suse.cz>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:33 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/19 2:45 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > +config INIT_HEAP_ALL
> > + bool "Initialize kernel heap allocations"
>
> Calling slab and page allocations together as "heap" is rather uncommon
> in the kernel I think. But I don't have a better word right now.
We can provide two separate flags for slab and page allocator to avoid this.
I cannot think of a situation where this level of control is necessary
though (apart from benchmarking).
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + Enforce initialization of pages allocated from page allocator
> > + and objects returned by kmalloc and friends.
> > + Allocated memory is initialized with zeroes, preventing possible
> > + information leaks and making the control-flow bugs that depend
> > + on uninitialized values more deterministic.
> > +
> > config GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_VERBOSE
> > bool "Report forcefully initialized variables"
> > depends on GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK
> >
>
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 12:45 Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-12 14:16 ` Qian Cai
2019-04-12 15:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-16 2:02 ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-16 8:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-16 12:21 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-16 8:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-16 12:04 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
2019-04-16 15:32 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-04-16 16:01 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-16 16:30 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-04-17 11:03 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-17 17:04 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAG_fn=VYa0CtxDeXOV0Mpj3q_i150NJioyJWGLA3OEij3iSH1A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=glider@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sspatil@android.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox