From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Miehlbradt <nicholas@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kmsan: remove runtime checks from kmsan_unpoison_memory()
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:23:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=Uy_h6YnQYdncewoUeOd4TutsRVygbHK5-qwn+zQYCvPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNP-9hV_d3zEHhUSpdUYpM1BAFKmTTzWwe5o5ubtwTvQAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:15 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 17:42, 'Alexander Potapenko' via kasan-dev
> <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Similarly to what's been done in commit ff444efbbb9be ("kmsan: allow
> > using __msan_instrument_asm_store() inside runtime"), it should be safe
> > to call kmsan_unpoison_memory() from within the runtime, as it does not
> > allocate memory or take locks. Remove the redundant runtime checks.
> >
> > This should fix false positives seen with CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y when
> > the non-instrumented lib/stackdepot.c failed to unpoison the memory
> > chunks later checked by the instrumented lib/list_debug.c
> >
> > Also replace the implementation of kmsan_unpoison_entry_regs() with
> > a call to kmsan_unpoison_memory().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Nicholas Miehlbradt <nicholas@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> missing ')', probably:
>
> + kmsan_unpoison_memory((void *)regs, sizeof(*regs));
My bad - you are right. Thanks for catching!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 16:42 Alexander Potapenko
2024-01-24 17:15 ` Marco Elver
2024-01-24 17:23 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAG_fn=Uy_h6YnQYdncewoUeOd4TutsRVygbHK5-qwn+zQYCvPA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=glider@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nicholas@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox