linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix memblock_free_late() when using deferred struct page
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:36:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=UZ8DX41YCZNo2PtqZbgwXHp_Bi8nZqe+t7SOMeTvmzMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYXDeN0WGQG8-cxe@kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 11:33 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> (added KMSAN folks)
>
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 08:02:13PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 09:39 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > I might be missing something but I don't see what would restrict
> > > > this
> > > > to the early pre-initialized struct pages other than that
> > > > early_page_initialised() test, so we can't rely on anything in
> > > > struct
> > > > page inside memblock_free_pages().
> > >
> > > Right, we can't rely on PG_Reserved being cleared for uninitialized
> > > pages :/
> > >
> > > But I overlooked an easier and actually reliable way: use
> > > free_reserved_area() instead of memblock_free_late().
> >
> > You mean replace all callers of memblock_free_late() and kill it ?
>
> That would be great, but with all the subtle differences you note below
> it's for the future :)
>
> > Or make memblock_free_late() use free_reserved_area() instead of
> > memblock_free_pages() ? :-)
>
> Yes, I think either calling free_reserved_page() in the loop in
> memblock_free_late() or replacing the entire loop with free_reserved_area().
>
> > The former misses:
> >  - totalram_pages_inc() and kmemleak_free_part_phys() in
> > memblock_free_late()
> >
> > They also both miss as far as I can tell:
> >
> >       if (!kmsan_memblock_free_pages(page, order)) {
> >               /* KMSAN will take care of these pages. */
> >               return;
> >       }
> >
> > But I don't know if that matters, I don't know anything about kmsan :-)
>
> AFAIU, here kmsan allocates metadata for each page freed to buddy, but it
> handles reserved memory differently anyway, so it shouldn't be a problem.

I am a bit late here, sorry.

Yes, kmsan_init_shadow() iterates over the reserved ranges (which I
believe happens before memblock_free_late(), right?) and reserves the
metadata pages for them. So freeing these ranges we won't need to call
kmsan_memblock_free_pages().


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-16 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03  8:02 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-03 18:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-03 19:53   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-04  7:39     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-04  9:02       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-06 10:33         ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-10  1:04           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-10  2:10             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-10  6:17               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-10  8:34                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-10 14:32                   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-10 23:23                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-11  5:20                       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-16  5:34                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-16  6:51                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-16  4:53                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-16 15:28                       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-16 10:36           ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
2026-02-17  8:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-17 12:32   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-17 22:00     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-17 21:47   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-18  0:15     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-18  8:05       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-19  2:48         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-19 10:16           ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-19 22:46             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-20  4:57               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-20  9:09                 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-20  9:00               ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-20  5:12             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-20  5:15             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2026-02-20  5:47             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG_fn=UZ8DX41YCZNo2PtqZbgwXHp_Bi8nZqe+t7SOMeTvmzMw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=glider@google.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox