linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:19:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKn8_LqR=oESz4QXxV7G-niD4rEmDpLepHqq50-zUrxcw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALYGNiO73NfhqrBoCwfdbMg5kNMC1nrNGeT9rUisBDHXTYY-Gg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits,
>>>>>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member
>>>>>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not
>>>>>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file
>>>>>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the
>>>>>> setuid/setgid/caps bits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done
>>>>>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). We
>>>>>> could do this during vm_mmap_pgoff, but that would need coverage in
>>>>>> mprotect as well, but to check for MAP_SHARED, we'd need to hold mmap_sem
>>>>>> again. We could clear at open() time, but it's possible things are
>>>>>> accidentally opening with O_RDWR and only reading. Better to clear on
>>>>>> close and error failures (i.e. an improvement over now, which is not
>>>>>> clearing at all).
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this should be done in mmap/mprotect. Code in sys_mmap is trivial.
>>>>>
>>>>> In sys_mprotect you can check file_needs_remove_privs() and VM_SHARED
>>>>> under mmap_sem, then if needed grab reference to struct file from vma and
>>>>> clear suid after unlocking mmap_sem.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't seen previous iterations, probably this approach has known flaws.
>>>>
>>>> mmap_sem is still needed in mprotect (to find and hold the vma), so
>>>> it's not possible. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I didn't see a
>>>> way.
>>>
>>> something like this
>>>
>>> @@ -375,6 +376,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
>>>
>>>         vm_flags = calc_vm_prot_bits(prot);
>>>
>>> +restart:
>>>         down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>>>
>>>         vma = find_vma(current->mm, start);
>>> @@ -416,6 +418,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long, start,
>>> size_t, len,
>>>                         goto out;
>>>                 }
>>>
>>> +               if ((newflags & VM_WRITE) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) &&
>>> +                   vma->vm_file && file_needs_remove_privs(vma->vm_file)) {
>>> +                       struct file *file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
>>> +
>>> +                       start = vma->vm_start;
>>> +                       up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>>> +                       mutex_lock(&file_inode(file)->i_mutex);
>>> +                       error = file_remove_privs(file);
>>> +                       mutex_unlock(&file_inode(file)->i_mutex);
>>> +                       fput(file);
>>> +                       if (error)
>>> +                               return error;
>>> +                       goto restart;
>>> +               }
>>> +
>>
>> Is this safe against the things Al mentioned? I still don't like the
>> mmap/mprotect approach because it makes the change before anything was
>> actually written...
>
> (I forgot to check VM_SHARED)
>
> Yep, this should be safe.
>
> I think suid should be cleared before any possible change of data.
> New content could hit the disk but suid never be cleared,
> for example if system suddenly crashed or rebooted.

Oooh, very good point. Yeah, that's enough to convince me. :) Ignore my v7...

Al, are you okay with this semantic change?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-08 23:27 Kees Cook
2016-01-09  4:28 ` Al Viro
2016-01-10 15:48 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-10 19:30   ` Al Viro
2016-01-10 19:51     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-10 21:10       ` Al Viro
2016-01-10 22:30         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-11 19:38   ` Kees Cook
2016-01-11 22:39     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-11 22:45       ` Kees Cook
2016-01-11 23:16         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-11 23:19           ` Kees Cook [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jKn8_LqR=oESz4QXxV7G-niD4rEmDpLepHqq50-zUrxcw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=yalin.wang2010@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox