From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add SLUB free list pointer obfuscation
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:08:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKRLNvb2Gy77Q4pTes6oHEypG=GCB56twb8A7jvz=FpLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505961f9-b266-191a-f4b7-931410a55149@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 08:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This SLUB free list pointer obfuscation code is modified from Brad
>> Spengler/PaX Team's code in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based
>> on my understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original
>> code are mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code.
>>
>> This adds a per-cache random value to SLUB caches that is XORed with
>> their freelist pointers. This adds nearly zero overhead and frustrates the
>> very common heap overflow exploitation method of overwriting freelist
>> pointers. A recent example of the attack is written up here:
>> http://cyseclabs.com/blog/cve-2016-6187-heap-off-by-one-exploit
>>
>> This is based on patches by Daniel Micay, and refactored to avoid lots
>> of #ifdef code.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/slub_def.h | 4 ++++
>> init/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
>> mm/slub.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
>> index 07ef550c6627..0258d6d74e9c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
>> @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ struct kmem_cache {
>> #endif
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_HARDENED
>> + unsigned long random;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> /*
>> * Defragmentation by allocating from a remote node.
>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> index 1d3475fc9496..eb91082546bf 100644
>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> @@ -1900,6 +1900,16 @@ config SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM
>> security feature reduces the predictability of the kernel slab
>> allocator against heap overflows.
>>
>> +config SLAB_HARDENED
>> + bool "Harden slab cache infrastructure"
>> + default y
>> + depends on SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM && SLUB> + help
>> + Many kernel heap attacks try to target slab cache metadata and
>> + other infrastructure. This options makes minor performance
>> + sacrifies to harden the kernel slab allocator against common
>> + exploit methods.
>> +
>
> Going to bikeshed on SLAB_HARDENED unless this is intended to be used for
> more things. Perhaps SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED?
Daniel's tree has a bunch of changes attached to that config name, but
it's unclear to me how many would be accepted upstream. I would be
fine with SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED.
> What's the reason for the dependency on SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM?
Looking at it again, I suspect the idea was to collect other configs
under SLAB_HARDENED. It should likely be either be a select or just
dropped.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 3:01 Kees Cook
2017-06-20 18:05 ` Laura Abbott
2017-06-20 18:08 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGXu5jKRLNvb2Gy77Q4pTes6oHEypG=GCB56twb8A7jvz=FpLg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox