From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f71.google.com (mail-it0-f71.google.com [209.85.214.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C974D6B0390 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:52:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f71.google.com with SMTP id 68so277127itx.12 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z186si129949itd.89.2017.03.30.12.52.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id y18so683341itc.1 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170330194143.cbracica3w3ijrcx@codemonkey.org.uk> References: <20170330194143.cbracica3w3ijrcx@codemonkey.org.uk> From: Kees Cook Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:52:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sudo x86info -a => kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:78! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Jones , Kees Cook , Tommi Rantala , Linux-MM , LKML , Laura Abbott , Ingo Molnar , Josh Poimboeuf , Mark Rutland , Eric Biggers On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:45:26AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Tommi Rantala > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Running: > > > > > > $ sudo x86info -a > > > > > > On this HP ZBook 15 G3 laptop kills the x86info process with segfault and > > > produces the following kernel BUG. > > > > > > $ git describe > > > v4.11-rc4-40-gfe82203 > > > > > > It is also reproducible with the fedora kernel: 4.9.14-200.fc25.x86_64 > > > > > > Full dmesg output here: https://pastebin.com/raw/Kur2mpZq > > > > > > [ 51.418954] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from > > > ffff880000090000 (dma-kmalloc-256) (4096 bytes) > > > > This seems like a real exposure: the copy is attempting to read 4096 > > bytes from a 256 byte object. > > The code[1] is doing a 4k read from /dev/mem in the range 0x90000 -> 0xa0000 > According to arch/x86/mm/init.c:devmem_is_allowed, that's still valid.. > > Note that the printk is using the direct mapping address. Is that what's > being passed down to devmem_is_allowed now ? If so, that's probably what broke. So this is attempting to read physical memory 0x90000 -> 0xa0000, but that's somehow resolving to a virtual address that is claimed by dma-kmalloc?? I'm confused how that's happening... -Kees > > Dave > > [1] https://github.com/kernelslacker/x86info/blob/master/mptable.c -- Kees Cook Pixel Security -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org