linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:19:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJ+r6rUK=GbZDNOLLduF4wbJUrC7ytBZ6bSA+1cZF+5Ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202161851.95d8fe811705c038e3fe2d33@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:03:42 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits,
>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member
>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not
>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file
>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the
>> setuid/setgid/caps bits.
>>
>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done
>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault).
>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -1340,6 +1340,17 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>>                       if (locks_verify_locked(file))
>>                               return -EAGAIN;
>>
>> +                     /*
>> +                      * If we must remove privs, we do it here since
>> +                      * doing it during page COW is expensive and
>> +                      * cannot hold inode->i_mutex.
>> +                      */
>> +                     if (prot & PROT_WRITE && !IS_NOSEC(inode)) {
>> +                             mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> +                             file_remove_privs(file);
>> +                             mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> +                     }
>> +
>
> Still ignoring the file_remove_privs() return value.  If this is
> deliberate then a description of the reasons should be included?

Actually, there is a bigger problem:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/lkp/2015-December/003185.html

[   37.741286] trinity-c0/742 is trying to acquire lock:
[   37.741982]  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<811c3b34>]
do_mmap+0x544/0x670
[   37.752562]
[   37.752562] but task is already holding lock:
[   37.753442]  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<811c3d70>]
SyS_remap_file_pages+0xe0/0x350

Jan, any thoughts on avoiding this?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03  0:03 Kees Cook
2015-12-03  0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-03 16:07   ` Kees Cook
2015-12-03 18:19   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2015-12-04  1:45 ` [PATCH v2] " yalin wang
2015-12-07 22:42   ` Kees Cook
2015-12-08  0:40     ` Kees Cook
2015-12-09  8:26       ` Jan Kara
2015-12-09 22:52         ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jJ+r6rUK=GbZDNOLLduF4wbJUrC7ytBZ6bSA+1cZF+5Ow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox