From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang)" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"康纪滨 (Steve Kang)" <Steve.Kang@unisoc.com>
Subject: Re: summarize all information again at bottom//reply: reply: [PATCH] mm: fix a race scenario in folio_isolate_lru
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:52:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWkznFtez1fj2L2CtFnA5k-Tn4WtxmDOw=fjOWPg-ZGJX=VWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfwpuRjAZV07_lc3@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:36 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 04:25:07PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > ok. Could the scenario below be suspicious on leaving an orphan folio
> > in step 7 and introduce the bug in step 8. In the scenario,
> > Thread_filemap behaves as a backdoor for Thread_madv by creating the
> > pte after Thread_truncate finishes cleaning all page tables.
> >
> > 0. Thread_bad gets the folio by folio_get_entry and stores it in its
> > local fbatch_bad and go to sleep
>
> There's no function called folio_get_entry(), but clearly thread_bad
> should have a refcount on it at this point.
>
> > 1. Thread_filemap get the folio via
> > filemap_map_pages->next_uptodate_folio->xas_next_entry and gets
> > preempted
> > refcnt == 1(page_cache), PG_lru == true
>
> so the refcount should be 2 here.
>
> > 2. Thread_truncate get the folio via
> > truncate_inode_pages_range->find_lock_entries
> > refcnt == 2(fbatch_trunc, page_cache), PG_lru == true
> >
> > 3. Thread_truncate proceed to truncate_cleanup_folio
> > refcnt == 2(fbatch_trunc, page_cache), PG_lru == true
> >
> > 4. Thread_truncate proceed to delete_from_page_cache_batch
> > refcnt == 1(fbatch_trunc), PG_lru == true
> >
> > 5. Thread_filemap schedule back and proceed to setup a pte and have
> > folio->_mapcnt = 0 & folio->refcnt += 1
> > refcnt == 2(pte, fbatch_temp), PG_lru == true
> >
> > 6. Thread_madv clear folio's PG_lru by
> > madvise_xxx_pte_range->folio_isolate_lru->folio_test_clear_lru
> > refcnt == 2(pte,fbatch_temp), PG_lru == false
> >
> > 7. Thread_truncate call folio_fbatch_release and failed in freeing
> > folio as refcnt not reach 0
> > refcnt == 1(pte), PG_lru == false
> > ********folio becomes an orphan here which is not on the page cache
> > but on the task's VM**********
> >
> > 8. Thread_xxx scheduled back from 0 to do release_pages(fbatch_bad)
> > and have the folio introduce the bug.
>
> ... because if these steps happen as 7, 8, 6, you hit the BUG in
> folio_isolate_lru().
Thanks for the comments. fix the typo and update the timing sequence
by amending possible preempt points to have the refcnt make sense.
0. Thread_bad gets the folio by find_get_entry and preempted before
take refcnt(could be the second round scan of
truncate_inode_pages_range)
refcnt == 1(page_cache), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
find_get_entry
folio = xas_find
<preempted>
folio_try_get_rcu
1. Thread_filemap get the folio via
filemap_map_pages->next_uptodate_folio->xas_next_entry and gets preempted
refcnt == 1(page_cache), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
filemap_map_pages
next_uptodate_folio
xas_next_entry
<preempted>
folio_try_get_rcu
2. Thread_truncate get the folio via
truncate_inode_pages_range->find_lock_entries
refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
3. Thread_truncate proceed to truncate_cleanup_folio
refcnt == 2(page_cache, fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
4. Thread_truncate proceed to delete_from_page_cache_batch
refcnt == 1(fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true
4.1 folio_unlock
refcnt == 1(fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == true, PG_lock == false
5. Thread_filemap schedule back from '1' and proceed to setup a pte
and have folio->_mapcnt = 0 & folio->refcnt += 1
refcnt == 1->2(+fbatch_filemap)->3->2(pte, fbatch_truncate),
PG_lru == true, PG_lock == true->false
6. Thread_madv clear folio's PG_lru by
madvise_xxx_pte_range->folio_isolate_lru->folio_test_clear_lru
refcnt == 2(pte,fbatch_truncate), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
7. Thread_truncate call folio_fbatch_release and failed in freeing
folio as refcnt not reach 0
refcnt == 1(pte), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == false
********folio becomes an orphan here which is not on the page cache
but on the task's VM**********
8. Thread_bad scheduled back from '0' to be collected in fbatch_bad
refcnt == 2(pte, fbatch_bad), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true
9. Thread_bad clear one refcnt wrongly when doing filemap_remove_folio
as it take this refcnt as the page cache one
refcnt == 1(fbatch_bad), PG_lru == false, PG_lock == true->false
truncate_inode_folio
filemap_remove_folio
filemap_free_folio
******refcnt decreased wrongly here by being taken as the page cache one ******
10. Thread_bad calls release_pages(fbatch_bad) and has the folio
introduce the bug.
release_pages
folio_put_testzero == true
folio_test_lru == false
list_add(folio->lru, pages_to_free)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 9:32 黄朝阳 (Zhaoyang Huang)
2024-03-18 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-19 0:48 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-19 3:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-21 8:25 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-21 12:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-22 1:52 ` Zhaoyang Huang [this message]
2024-03-22 3:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-24 11:14 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-25 3:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 9:06 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-26 12:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-27 1:25 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-27 12:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-28 1:27 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-28 3:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-28 4:03 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-28 14:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-29 5:49 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-03-29 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGWkznFtez1fj2L2CtFnA5k-Tn4WtxmDOw=fjOWPg-ZGJX=VWw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=Steve.Kang@unisoc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox