From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ke Wang <ke.wang@unisoc.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix racing of vb->va when kasan enabled
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 19:00:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWkznFdZ1_jrSWSOPkSDyLY1OSodZBy6MTfdwPKo3VoW67GBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrGO4cae/03r3PzP@pc638.lan>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:27 PM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:44 PM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Is it easy to reproduce? If so could you please describe the steps? As i see
> > > > > the freeing of the "vb" is RCU safe whereas vb->va is not. But from the first
> > > > > glance i do not see how it can accessed twice. Hm..
> > > > It was raised from a monkey test on A13_k515 system and got 1/20 pcs
> > > > failed. IMO, vb->va which out of vmap_purge_lock protection could race
> > > > with a concurrent ra freeing within __purge_vmap_area_lazy.
> > > >
> > > Do you have exact steps how you run "monkey" test?
> > There are about 30+ kos inserted during startup which could be a
> > specific criteria for reproduction. Do you have doubts about the test
> > result or the solution?
> > >
> I do not have any doubt about your test results, so if you can trigger it
> then there is an issue at least on the 5.4.161-android12 kernel.
>
> 1. With your fix we get expanded mutex range, thus the worst case of vmalloc
> allocation can be increased when it fails and repeat. Because it also invokes
> the purge_vmap_area_lazy() that access the same mutex.
I am not sure I get your point. _vm_unmap_aliases calls
_purge_vmap_area_lazy instead of purge_vmap_area_lazy. Do you have any
other solutions? I really don't think my patch is the best way as I
don't have a full view of vmalloc mechanism.
>
> 2. You run 5.4.161-android12 kernel what is quite old. Could you please
> retest with latest kernel? I am asking because on the latest kernel with
> CONFIG_KASAN i am not able to reproduce it.
>
> I do a lot of: vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram()/vmalloc()/vfree() in parallel
> by 64 kthreads on my 64 CPUs test system.
The failure generates at 20s from starting up, I think it is a rare timing.
>
> Could you please confirm that you can trigger an issue on the latest kernel?
Sorry, I don't have an available latest kernel for now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 2:52 zhaoyang.huang
2022-05-26 6:31 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-06-19 21:03 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-20 6:58 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-20 10:43 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-20 11:23 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-21 9:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-21 11:00 ` Zhaoyang Huang [this message]
2022-06-21 14:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-22 3:15 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-22 6:04 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-24 10:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-24 10:51 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGWkznFdZ1_jrSWSOPkSDyLY1OSodZBy6MTfdwPKo3VoW67GBg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox