linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Ke Wang <ke.wang@unisoc.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix racing of vb->va when kasan enabled
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:23:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWkznE5cFfdtmQ2j57goWtpfPGYPsd5Oi3pvb9vcfifodR9OQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+KHdyXpdow7SYsbq_7F0zDd5-nYGi6db7R11R3--g3gUu-59w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:44 PM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > Is it easy to reproduce? If so could you please describe the steps? As i see
> > > the freeing of the "vb" is RCU safe whereas vb->va is not. But from the first
> > > glance i do not see how it can accessed twice. Hm..
> > It was raised from a monkey test on A13_k515 system and got 1/20 pcs
> > failed. IMO, vb->va which out of vmap_purge_lock protection could race
> > with a concurrent ra freeing within __purge_vmap_area_lazy.
> >
> Do you have exact steps how you run "monkey" test?
There are about 30+ kos inserted during startup which could be a
specific criteria for reproduction. Do you have doubts about the test
result or the solution?
>
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-20 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25  2:52 zhaoyang.huang
2022-05-26  6:31 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-06-19 21:03   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-20  6:58     ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-20 10:43       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-20 11:23         ` Zhaoyang Huang [this message]
2022-06-21  9:26           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-21 11:00             ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-21 14:29               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-22  3:15                 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-22  6:04                   ` Zhaoyang Huang
2022-06-24 10:27                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-06-24 10:51                       ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGWkznE5cFfdtmQ2j57goWtpfPGYPsd5Oi3pvb9vcfifodR9OQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox