From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: osalvador@techadventures.net
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
osalvador@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Get rid of link_mem_sections
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:35:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGM2reb6p-ffZ6-JDc5vqMkyDNDn9siWjEy9LnVJ1BtTKYhegA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601125321.30652-4-osalvador@techadventures.net>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:54 AM <osalvador@techadventures.net> wrote:
>
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>
> link_mem_sections() and walk_memory_range() share most of the code,
> so we can use walk_memory_range() with a callback to register_mem_sect_under_node()
> instead of using link_mem_sections().
Yes, their logic is indeed identical, so it is good to replace some
code with walk_memory_range().
>
> To control whether the node id must be check, two new functions has been added:
>
> register_mem_sect_under_node_nocheck_node()
> and
> register_mem_sect_under_node_check_node()
I do not like this, please see if my suggestion is better:
1. Revert all the changes outside of link_mem_sections()
2. Remove check_nid argument from register_mem_sect_under_node
and link_mem_sections.
3. In register_mem_sect_under_node
Replace:
if (check_nid) {
}
With:
if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
}
4. Change register_mem_sect_under_node() prototype to match callback
of walk_memory_range()
5. Call walk_memory_range(... register_mem_sect_under_node ...) from
link_mem_sections
Thank you,
Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 12:53 [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug osalvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Make add_memory_resource use __try_online_node osalvador
2018-06-07 10:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-20 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-21 1:41 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 7:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Call register_mem_sect_under_node osalvador
2018-06-21 2:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Get rid of link_mem_sections osalvador
2018-06-21 2:35 ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2018-06-25 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-25 17:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node osalvador
2018-06-21 2:38 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-07 10:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-07 13:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-18 7:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-21 8:32 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGM2reb6p-ffZ6-JDc5vqMkyDNDn9siWjEy9LnVJ1BtTKYhegA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox