linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc: "kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, "Minchan Kim" <minchan@google.com>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
	lokeshgidra@google.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Kate Stewart" <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	pombredanne@nexb.com, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Speed up mremap on large regions
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:21:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez3yLkMcyaTXFt_+w8_-HtmrjW=XB51DDQSGdjPj43XWmA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181009201400.168705-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

+cc xen maintainers and kvm folks

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:40 AM Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
> not enabled. The bottleneck is move_page_tables, which is copying each
> pte at a time, and can be really slow across a large map. Turning on THP
> may not be a viable option, and is not for us. This patch speeds up the
> performance for non-THP system by copying at the PMD level when possible.
[...]
> +bool move_normal_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long old_addr,
> +                 unsigned long new_addr, unsigned long old_end,
> +                 pmd_t *old_pmd, pmd_t *new_pmd, bool *need_flush)
> +{
[...]
> +       /*
> +        * We don't have to worry about the ordering of src and dst
> +        * ptlocks because exclusive mmap_sem prevents deadlock.
> +        */
> +       old_ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, old_pmd);
> +       if (old_ptl) {
> +               pmd_t pmd;
> +
> +               new_ptl = pmd_lockptr(mm, new_pmd);
> +               if (new_ptl != old_ptl)
> +                       spin_lock_nested(new_ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +
> +               /* Clear the pmd */
> +               pmd = *old_pmd;
> +               pmd_clear(old_pmd);
> +
> +               VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd));
> +
> +               /* Set the new pmd */
> +               set_pmd_at(mm, new_addr, new_pmd, pmd);
> +               if (new_ptl != old_ptl)
> +                       spin_unlock(new_ptl);
> +               spin_unlock(old_ptl);

How does this interact with Xen PV? From a quick look at the Xen PV
integration code in xen_alloc_ptpage(), it looks to me as if, in a
config that doesn't use split ptlocks, this is going to temporarily
drop Xen's type count for the page to zero, causing Xen to de-validate
and then re-validate the L1 pagetable; if you first set the new pmd
before clearing the old one, that wouldn't happen. I don't know how
this interacts with shadow paging implementations.

> +               *need_flush = true;
> +               return true;
> +       }
> +       return false;
> +}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-09 20:14 Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-09 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-09 23:08   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-09 22:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-09 23:04   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-10 10:00     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-11  0:46       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-11  0:50         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-11  5:14         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-11  8:11           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12  1:47             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-11  8:17         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-11 12:02           ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-12  3:21 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2018-10-12  5:29   ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-12  5:34     ` Jann Horn
2018-10-12  7:29       ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-12  7:24   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG48ez3yLkMcyaTXFt_+w8_-HtmrjW=XB51DDQSGdjPj43XWmA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox