From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap: Add anon_vma lifetime debug check
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:15:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez3aiXUmCqu2i7g6qrnVmZ6PRUsA-rQzHX1r8SXeYh2sow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cfc1146-1b62-4b04-a2e5-997d10ba4124@lucifer.local>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 5:07 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 04:48:09PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 3:49 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > > We're sort of relying on this
> > > > >
> > > > > a. being a UAF
> > > > >
> > > > > b. the thing we're UAF-ing not either corrupting this field or (if that
> > > > > memory is actually reused as an anon_vma - I'm not familiar with slab
> > > > > caches - so maybe it's quite likely - getting its refcount incremented.
> > > >
> > > > KASAN sees the memory read I'm doing with this atomic_read(), so in
> > > > KASAN builds, if this is a UAF, it should trigger a KASAN splat
> > > > (modulo KASAN limitations around when UAF can be detected). Basically,
> > > > in KASAN builds, the actual explicit check I'm doing here is only
> > > > relevant if the object has not yet been freed. That's why I wrote the
> > > > comment "Part of the purpose of the atomic_read() is to make KASAN
> > > > check that the anon_vma is still alive.".
> > >
> > > Hm, I'm confused, how can you detect a UAF if the object cannot yet be
> > > freed? :P
> > >
> > > or would that be the case were it not an atomic_read()?
> > >
> > > I guess this permits this to be detected in a timely manner.
> >
> > If the anon_vma hasn't yet been freed, but its refcount is 0, then
> > that's still a bug because we rely on the anon_vma to have a nonzero
> > refcount as long as there are folios with a nonzero mapcount that are
> > tied to it, and it is likely to allow UAF at a later point.
>
> But how is this happening?
>
> The only places where we might explicitly manipulate anon_vma->refcount
> are:
>
> - anon_vma_ctor() -> set to 0 on construction used by slab.
> - folio_lock_anon_vma_read() / put_anon_vma() - both cases call
> __put_anon_vma() when 0 to free the anon_vma.
>
> So how could we get to a refcount of 0 but the anon_vma still be hanging
> around, except if it's freshly allocated?
Due to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, the anon_vma is guaranteed to still be
accessible (possibly post-recycling) for an RCU grace period after its
refcount drops to zero. Under CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG (which you need
for KASAN to catch UAF in such slabs semi-reliably), from KASAN's
perspective, the anon_vma is effectively freed after an RCU grace
period.
Basically CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG turns kmem_cache_free() on
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slabs into something like kfree_rcu(), and this
allows KASAN to catch UAF access.
> It's surely only UAF?
I mean, "UAF" is kind of vague when talking about SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
slabs. I am only using the term "UAF" when talking about a situation
where accessing the anon_vma object is entirely forbidden because an
RCU grace period has passed after it was "freed" with
kmem_cache_free().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-24 19:13 Jann Horn
2025-07-24 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2025-07-25 10:59 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-24 21:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-25 11:08 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 11:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-25 11:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-25 11:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 12:00 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 13:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 14:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 14:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 14:48 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 15:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 15:15 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2025-07-25 15:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 15:27 ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 15:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-25 15:05 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG48ez3aiXUmCqu2i7g6qrnVmZ6PRUsA-rQzHX1r8SXeYh2sow@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox