From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: security@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/khugepaged: Fix GUP-fast interaction by sending IPI
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:56:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez0iS2BZd9BAXZLBA3D0fzNePSLWoXqAbYWsTig4nN5FrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbLzkp7+ZrXkoYcVtqrd2mQN3FZ4Y6tyeZCd31Oubz=+esaJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 8:54 PM Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 70cbc3cc78a99 ("mm: gup: fix the fast GUP race against THP
> > collapse"), the lockless_pages_from_mm() fastpath rechecks the pmd_t to
> > ensure that the page table was not removed by khugepaged in between.
> >
> > However, lockless_pages_from_mm() still requires that the page table is not
> > concurrently freed or reused to store non-PTE data. Otherwise, problems
> > can occur because:
> >
> > - deposited page tables can be freed when a THP page somewhere in the
> > mm is removed
> > - some architectures store non-PTE information inside deposited page
> > tables (see radix__pgtable_trans_huge_deposit())
> >
> > Additionally, lockless_pages_from_mm() is also somewhat brittle with
> > regards to page tables being repeatedly moved back and forth, but
> > that shouldn't be an issue in practice.
> >
> > Fix it by sending IPIs (if the architecture uses
> > semi-RCU-style page table freeing) before freeing/reusing page tables.
> >
> > As noted in mm/gup.c, on configs that define CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP,
> > there are two possible cases:
> >
> > 1. CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE is set, causing
> > tlb_remove_table_sync_one() to send an IPI to synchronize with
> > lockless_pages_from_mm().
> > 2. CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE is unset, indicating that all
> > TLB flushes are already guaranteed to send IPIs.
> > tlb_remove_table_sync_one() will do nothing, but we've already
> > run pmdp_collapse_flush(), which did a TLB flush, which must have
> > involved IPIs.
>
> I'm trying to catch up with the discussion after the holiday break. I
> understand you switched from always allocating a new page table page
> (we decided before) to sending IPIs to serialize against fast-GUP,
> this is fine to me.
>
> So the code now looks like:
> pmdp_collapse_flush()
> sending IPI
>
> But the missing part is how we reached "TLB flushes are already
> guaranteed to send IPIs" when CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE is
> unset? ARM64 doesn't do it IIRC. Or did I miss something?
From arch/arm64/Kconfig:
select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE is not a config option that the user
can freely toggle; it is an option selected by the architecture.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 18:02 [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/khugepaged: Take the right locks for page table retraction Jann Horn
2022-11-28 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/khugepaged: Fix GUP-fast interaction by sending IPI Jann Horn
2022-11-28 19:54 ` Yang Shi
2022-11-28 19:56 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2022-11-28 20:10 ` Yang Shi
2022-11-28 20:11 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-28 22:10 ` Yang Shi
2022-11-29 15:30 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-28 20:15 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-28 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/khugepaged: Invoke MMU notifiers in shmem/file collapse paths Jann Horn
2022-11-28 18:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 19:56 ` Yang Shi
2022-11-28 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/khugepaged: Take the right locks for page table retraction Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG48ez0iS2BZd9BAXZLBA3D0fzNePSLWoXqAbYWsTig4nN5FrQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox