From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce new .mmap_proto() f_op callback
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:44:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez04yOEVx1ekzOChARDDBZzAKwet8PEoPM4Ln3_rk91AzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1bf4b452cc10281ef831c5e38ce16f09923f8c5.1746040540.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 9:54 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> Provide a means by which drivers can specify which fields of those
> permitted to be changed should be altered to prior to mmap()'ing a
> range (which may either result from a merge or from mapping an entirely new
> VMA).
>
> Doing so is substantially safer than the existing .mmap() calback which
> provides unrestricted access to the part-constructed VMA and permits
> drivers and file systems to do 'creative' things which makes it hard to
> reason about the state of the VMA after the function returns.
>
> The existing .mmap() callback's freedom has caused a great deal of issues,
> especially in error handling, as unwinding the mmap() state has proven to
> be non-trivial and caused significant issues in the past, for instance
> those addressed in commit 5de195060b2e ("mm: resolve faulty mmap_region()
> error path behaviour").
>
> It also necessitates a second attempt at merge once the .mmap() callback
> has completed, which has caused issues in the past, is awkward, adds
> overhead and is difficult to reason about.
>
> The .mmap_proto() callback eliminates this requirement, as we can update
> fields prior to even attempting the first merge. It is safer, as we heavily
> restrict what can actually be modified, and being invoked very early in the
> mmap() process, error handling can be performed safely with very little
> unwinding of state required.
I wonder if this requires adjustments to the existing users of
call_mmap() that use call_mmap() for forwarding mmap operations to
some kind of backing file. In particular fuse_passthrough_mmap(),
which I think can operate on fairly arbitrary user-supplied backing
files (for context, I think fuse_backing_open() allows root to just
provide an fd to be used as backing file).
I guess the easiest approach would be to add bailouts to those if an
->mmap_proto handler exists for now, and revisit this if we ever want
to use ->mmap_proto for more normal types of files?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 19:54 [RFC PATCH 0/3] eliminate mmap() retry merge, add .mmap_proto hook Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce new .mmap_proto() f_op callback Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 21:44 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2025-05-01 10:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 21:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-01 10:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 12:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-01 13:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 13:51 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-05-01 13:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-05 13:29 ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-06 10:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: secretmem: convert to .mmap_proto() hook Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:54 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/vma: remove mmap() retry merge Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] eliminate mmap() retry merge, add .mmap_proto hook Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 19:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 21:29 ` Jann Horn
2025-05-01 10:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 14:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG48ez04yOEVx1ekzOChARDDBZzAKwet8PEoPM4Ln3_rk91AzQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox