From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION d7a03a44a5e93f39ece70ec75d25c6088caa0fdb
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:15:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFqt6zba=TmE4U9rq2KGA07tcxwWVmKwe7Fgy4z=jnvcjQaAWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fe3ac9b.VaaHVg8wSzhBNgcu%lkp@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:17 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> branch HEAD: d7a03a44a5e93f39ece70ec75d25c6088caa0fdb Add linux-next specific files for 20201223
>
> Error/Warning reports:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202011250841.Tq5AqGpo-lkp@intel.com
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202012141529.yE4vDrxh-lkp@intel.com
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c:12:
>> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:41:19: error: redefinition of 'get_unaligned_be16'
41 | static inline u16 get_unaligned_be16(const void *p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/asm-generic/unaligned.h:26,
from arch/arc/include/asm/unaligned.h:11,
from arch/arc/include/asm/io.h:12,
from include/linux/io.h:13,
from include/linux/irq.h:20,
from drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c:5:
include/linux/unaligned/be_struct.h:7:19: note: previous definition
of 'get_unaligned_be16' was here
7 | static inline u16 get_unaligned_be16(const void *p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS not defined, it also includes
# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h> which has definitions for
below functions
as well.
>
> Error/Warning in current branch:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "__umoddi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!
This part of the error report is confusing as it gives an impression
of error in the btrfs part
until I open the 2nd link above.
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:41:19: error: redefinition of 'get_unaligned_be16'
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:46:19: error: redefinition of 'get_unaligned_be32'
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:51:19: error: redefinition of 'get_unaligned_be64'
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:56:20: error: redefinition of 'put_unaligned_be16'
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:61:20: error: redefinition of 'put_unaligned_be32'
> include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:66:20: error: redefinition of 'put_unaligned_be64'
>
> possible Error/Warning in current branch:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x50f236): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpumask_clear_cpu() to the variable .init.data:pcpu_build_alloc_info.mask
>
> Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs:
>
> gcc_recent_errors
> |-- arc-allyesconfig
> | |-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-get_unaligned_be16
> | |-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-get_unaligned_be32
> | |-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-get_unaligned_be64
> | |-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-put_unaligned_be16
> | |-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-put_unaligned_be32
> | `-- include-linux-unaligned-be_byteshift.h:error:redefinition-of-put_unaligned_be64
> `-- sh-allmodconfig
> `-- ERROR:__umoddi3-fs-btrfs-btrfs.ko-undefined
>
> clang_recent_errors
> `-- x86_64-randconfig-a013-20201221
> `-- Section-mismatch-in-reference-from-the-function-cpumask_clear_cpu()-to-the-variable-.init.data:pcpu_build_alloc_info.mask
>
> elapsed time: 916m
>
> configs tested: 88
> configs skipped: 2
>
> gcc tested configs:
> arm defconfig
> arm allyesconfig
> arm allmodconfig
> arm64 allyesconfig
> arm64 defconfig
> nds32 alldefconfig
> sh se7206_defconfig
> arm pleb_defconfig
> arm mvebu_v7_defconfig
> sh se7721_defconfig
> m68k hp300_defconfig
> sh rsk7269_defconfig
> arc haps_hs_defconfig
> arm aspeed_g5_defconfig
> mips bmips_stb_defconfig
> xtensa iss_defconfig
> csky defconfig
> alpha defconfig
> arm s3c2410_defconfig
> powerpc64 alldefconfig
> powerpc iss476-smp_defconfig
> arm aspeed_g4_defconfig
> mips rm200_defconfig
> ia64 allmodconfig
> ia64 defconfig
> ia64 allyesconfig
> m68k allmodconfig
> m68k defconfig
> m68k allyesconfig
> nios2 defconfig
> arc allyesconfig
> nds32 allnoconfig
> c6x allyesconfig
> nds32 defconfig
> nios2 allyesconfig
> alpha allyesconfig
> xtensa allyesconfig
> h8300 allyesconfig
> arc defconfig
> sh allmodconfig
> parisc defconfig
> s390 allyesconfig
> parisc allyesconfig
> s390 defconfig
> i386 allyesconfig
> sparc allyesconfig
> sparc defconfig
> i386 tinyconfig
> i386 defconfig
> mips allyesconfig
> mips allmodconfig
> powerpc allyesconfig
> powerpc allmodconfig
> powerpc allnoconfig
> x86_64 randconfig-a001-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a006-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a002-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a005-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a006-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a004-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a003-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a001-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a011-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a016-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a014-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a012-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a015-20201223
> i386 randconfig-a013-20201223
> riscv nommu_virt_defconfig
> riscv rv32_defconfig
> riscv nommu_k210_defconfig
> riscv allyesconfig
> riscv allnoconfig
> riscv defconfig
> riscv allmodconfig
> x86_64 rhel
> x86_64 allyesconfig
> x86_64 rhel-7.6-kselftests
> x86_64 defconfig
> x86_64 rhel-8.3
> x86_64 rhel-8.3-kbuiltin
> x86_64 kexec
>
> clang tested configs:
> x86_64 randconfig-a015-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a014-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a016-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a012-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a013-20201223
> x86_64 randconfig-a011-20201223
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-25 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-23 20:46 kernel test robot
2020-12-25 3:45 ` Souptick Joarder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFqt6zba=TmE4U9rq2KGA07tcxwWVmKwe7Fgy4z=jnvcjQaAWA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox