From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx162.postini.com [74.125.245.162]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58D846B0032 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:28:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id it19so150792bkc.41 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 02:28:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51F8D016.4090009@huawei.com> References: <1375255885-10648-1-git-send-email-h.huangqiang@huawei.com> <51F8D016.4090009@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:28:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] memcg: fix memcg resource limit overflow issues From: Sha Zhengju Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Qiang Huang Cc: Cgroups , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Sha Zhengju , lizefan@huawei.com, Daisuke Nishimura , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Jeff Liu On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Qiang Huang wrote: > On 2013/7/31 16:23, Sha Zhengju wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Qiang Huang wrote: >>> This issue is first discussed in: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136574878704295&w=2 >>> >>> Then a second version sent to: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136776855928310&w=2 >>> >>> We contacted Sha a month ago, she seems have no time to deal with it >>> recently, but we quite need this patch. So I modified and resent it. >> >> >> No, I didn't receive any of YOUR message, only a engineer named Libo >> Chen from Huawei connected me recently. I don't approve you to resent >> them on behalf of me, and just before you send this you even don't >> send me a mail. Besides, after a rough look, I do not see any >> innovative ideas from yourself but just rework patches from my last >> version. >> So I'm strong against this patchset. > > Sorry if this troubles you. > Libo Chen is my colleague, we work together, he sent an email to you on > 25 June, to ask about this issue, you said you'll resent it soon, but it > didn't happen until now :(, and he asked again the other day and you didn't > reply. No, I replied him. I told him I'm working on another patchset, and I planned to sent this after that one, and then there's no responds from him. I've no idea it's so urgent to you. > I modified it and sent out. > > I think split patches, rewrite changelogs and tests, they all kind of work > right? Yes, it is. But you're doing on other people's work! > to upstream ASAP. > > So you want me rewrite this patchset and SOB only you or you want resent this > by yourself? I'm ok with both :) > > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org