From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F57A8E0004 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:27:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id y35so2059188edb.5 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id i26-v6sor1142145ejz.40.2018.12.07.06.27.26 for (Google Transport Security); Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:27:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181206082806.GB1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181206121152.GH1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181207075322.GS1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181207113044.GB1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181207142240.GC1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20181207142240.GC1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Pingfan Liu Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 22:27:13 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node offline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mike Rapoport , Bjorn Helgaas , Jonathan Cameron On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:22 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 07-12-18 21:20:17, Pingfan Liu wrote: > [...] > > Hi Michal, > > > > As I mentioned in my previous email, I have manually apply the patch, > > and the patch can not work for normal bootup. > > I am sorry, I have misread your previous response. Is there anything > interesting on the serial console by any chance? Nothing. It need more effort to debug. But as I mentioned, enable all of the rest possible node, then it works. Maybe it can give some help for you. diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 1308f54..4dc497d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -754,18 +754,23 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void) { int cpu; u16 *cpu_to_apicid = early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_cpu_to_apicid); + int node, nr; BUG_ON(cpu_to_apicid == NULL); + nr = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask); + + /* bring up all possible node, since dev->numa_node */ + //should check acpi works for node possible, + for_each_node(node) + if (!node_online(node)) + init_memory_less_node(node); for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - int node = numa_cpu_node(cpu); + node = numa_cpu_node(cpu); if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) continue; - if (!node_online(node)) - init_memory_less_node(node); - numa_set_node(cpu, node); } } Thanks, Pingfan